Association between FDA and EMA expedited approval programs and therapeutic value of new medicines: retrospective cohort study

被引:80
作者
Hwang, Thomas J. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Ross, Joseph S. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Vokinger, Kerstin N. [3 ,7 ]
Kesselheim, Aaron S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Med, Div Pharmacoepidemiol & Pharmacoecon, Program Regulat Therapeut & Law PORTAL, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Univ Zurich, Lab Technol Markets & Regulat, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Dept Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT 06510 USA
[5] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, New Haven, CT USA
[6] Yale New Haven Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, 20 York St, New Haven, CT 06504 USA
[7] Univ Zurich, Inst Law, Zurich, Switzerland
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2020年 / 371卷
关键词
US FOOD; CLINICAL BENEFIT; CANCER; DRUGS; STANDARDS; AGENTS; COST; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmj.m3434
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To characterize the therapeutic value of new drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) and the association between these ratings and regulatory approval through expedited programs. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING New drugs approved by the FDA and EMA between 2007 and 2017, with follow-up through 1 April 2020. DATA SOURCES Therapeutic value was measured using ratings of new drugs by five independent organizations (Prescrire and health authorities of Canada, France, Germany, and Italy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Proportion of new drugs rated as having high therapeutic value; association between high therapeutic value rating and expedited status. RESULTS From 2007 through 2017, the FDA and EMA approved 320 and 268 new drugs, respectively, of which 181 (57%) and 39 (15%) qualified for least one expedited program. Among 267 new drugs with a therapeutic value rating, 84 (31%) were rated as having high therapeutic value by at least one organization. Compared with non-expedited drugs, a greater proportion of expedited drugs were rated as having high therapeutic value among both FDA approvals (45% (69/153) v 13% (15/114); P<0.001) and EMA approvals (67% (18/27) v 27% (65/240); P<0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of expedited program for a drug being independently rated as having high therapeutic value were 82% (95% confidence interval 72% to 90%) and 54% (47% to 62%), respectively, for the FDA, compared with 25.3% (16.4% to 36.0%) and 90.2% (85.0% to 94.1%) for the EMA. CONCLUSIONS Less than a third of new drugs approved by the FDA and EMA over the past decade were rated as having high therapeutic value by at least one of five independent organizations. Although expedited drugs were more likely than non-expedited drugs to be highly rated, most expedited drugs approved by the FDA but not the EMA were rated as having low therapeutic value.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
AIFA, FARM INN
[2]  
[Anonymous], Conditional marketing authorisation
[3]   Three Steps Toward a More Sustainable Path for Targeted Cancer Drugs [J].
Bekelman, Justin E. ;
Joffe, Steven .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 319 (21) :2167-2168
[4]   Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks [J].
Del Paggio, Joseph C. ;
Sullivan, Richard ;
Schrag, Deborah ;
Hopman, Wilma M. ;
Azariah, Biju ;
Pramesh, C. S. ;
Tannock, Ian F. ;
Booth, Christopher M. .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2017, 18 (07) :887-894
[5]   Postmarket Safety Events Among Novel Therapeutics Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Between 2001 and 2010 [J].
Downing, Nicholas S. ;
Shah, Nilay D. ;
Aminawung, Jenerius A. ;
Pease, Alison M. ;
Zeitoun, Jean-David ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. ;
Ross, Joseph S. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2017, 317 (18) :1854-1863
[6]   Regulatory Review of New Therapeutic Agents - FDA versus EMA, 2011-2015 [J].
Downing, Nicholas S. ;
Zhang, Audrey D. ;
Ross, Joseph S. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2017, 376 (14) :1386-1387
[7]   Characterizing the US FDA's approach to promoting transformative innovation [J].
Downing, Nicholas S. ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. ;
Ross, Joseph S. ;
Shah, Nilay D. .
NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2015, 14 (11) :740-741
[8]   Clinical Trial Evidence Supporting FDA Approval of Novel Therapeutic Agents, 2005-2012 [J].
Downing, Nicholas S. ;
Aminawung, Jenerius A. ;
Shah, Nilay D. ;
Krumholz, Harlan M. ;
Ross, Joseph S. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2014, 311 (04) :368-377
[9]  
European Commission, 2017, MAPP HTA METH EU NOR
[10]  
European Medicines Agency, 2018, ENH EARL DIAL FAC AC