Superior outcomes of microsurgical vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners

被引:27
作者
Chan, PTK [1 ]
Goldstein, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Cornell Inst Reprod Med, Dept Urol, New York, NY 14853 USA
关键词
vasectomy reversal; vasovasostomy; vasoepididymostomy; infertility; obstructive azoospermia;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.09.066
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of vasectomy reversals in men with the same female partners. Design: Retrospective analysis with comparison with a historical cohort. Setting: University hospital. Patient(s): Among 1,048 patients who underwent microsurgical vasectomy reversal from 1986 to 2002, 27 men (2.6%) were identified who had the same partners as before their vasectomy. Intervention(s): Microsurgical vasovasostomy or vasoepididymostomy. Main Outcome Measure(s): Semen parameters, clinical pregnancy, and live birth rates. Result(s): The mean age of the men was 38.5 years, and 37.2 years for their female partners. The reasons for vasectomy reversal were death of a child in 33% of cases and desire for more children in 66% of cases. The overall patency rate was 100% at 1 month postoperatively, with an average sperm concentration of 30 million/mL and 24% motility. Among patients with follow-up beyond I year, the natural pregnancy rate was 86%, which was achieved at 8.3 months postoperatively, with a live birth rate of 82%. The live birth rate in couples with the death of a child was 100%. Conclusion(s): The outcomes of vasectomy reversal in men with the same female partners are better than for men with new partners. Possible reasons for these superior results are previous proven fecundity as a couple, shorter time interval since vasectomy, and emotional dedication.
引用
收藏
页码:1371 / 1374
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] RESULTS OF 1,469 MICROSURGICAL VASECTOMY REVERSALS BY THE VASOVASOSTOMY STUDY-GROUP
    BELKER, AM
    THOMAS, AJ
    FUCHS, EF
    KONNAK, JW
    SHARLIP, ID
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (03) : 505 - 511
  • [2] Chan PT, 2002, J UROLOGY, V167, P310
  • [3] CHAN PTK, 2001, 96 ANN M AM UR ASS, P307
  • [4] Comparison of microscopic epididymal sperm aspiration and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in-vitro fertilization with repeat microscopic reconstruction following vasectomy: Is second attempt vas reversal worth the effort?
    Donovan, JF
    DiBaise, M
    Sparks, AET
    Kessler, JA
    Sandlow, JI
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1998, 13 (02) : 387 - 393
  • [5] FAZELIMATIN S, 1994, 89 ANN M AM UR ASS S, pA303
  • [6] Microsurgical vasovasostomy: The microdot technique of precision suture placement
    Goldstein, M
    Li, PSH
    Matthews, GJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1998, 159 (01) : 188 - 190
  • [7] GOLDSTEIN M, 2002, CAMPBELLS UROLOGY, V2, P1532
  • [8] GOLDSTEIN M, ULTRAPRECISE MULTILA
  • [9] Vasoepididymostomy for vasectomy reversal: A critical assessment in the era of intracytoplasmic sperm injection
    Kolettis, PN
    Thomas, AJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (02) : 467 - 470
  • [10] KOLETTIS PN, 2002, 58 ANN M AM SOC REPR, pS258