Predicting surface porosity using a fine-scale index of roughness in a cultivated field

被引:17
作者
Sun, Y. [2 ]
Lin, J. [3 ]
Lammers, P. Schulze [1 ]
Damerow, L. [1 ]
Hueging, H. [4 ]
Zhang, H. [2 ]
Sun, W. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Dept Agr Engn, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[2] China Agr Univ, Res Ctr Precis Farming, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
[3] Beijing Forestry Univ, Sch Technol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Bonn, Inst Crop Sci & Resource Conservat, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Soil roughness; Surface porosity; Laser profiler measurement; SOIL ROUGHNESS; LASER SCANNER; TILLAGE; STORAGE; RAINFALL;
D O I
10.1016/j.still.2008.09.009
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Both soil porosity and surface elevation can be altered by tillage operation. Even though the surface porosity is an important parameter of a tilled field, however, no practical technique for rapid and non-contact measurement of surface porosity has been developed yet. On the contrary, the surface elevation of tilled soil can be quickly determined with a laser profiler. Working under the assumption that the surface elevation of a tilled field is a complicated superposition of the soil terrain profile at a larger-scale and the roughness at a fine-scale, this study included three aspects: (i) to present a differential index (RI) at a fine-scale to associate the surface roughness with porosity; (ii) to examine the correlation between surface porosity and the proposed RI by four types of tillage treatment in the field; and (iii) to check the influence of different grid sizes of calculating RI on predicting porosity. Consequently, the statistical results from each tilled plot demonstrated a strong correlation (0.889 <= R-2 <= 0.982) between the surface porosity and the defined RI in an early stage (ca. 20 days) after tillage. Moreover, a combined data analysis showed a linear approximation between both parameters with an R-2 value of 0.707 when the grid size was adequately small (2 cm x 2 cm). The pronounced influence of the grid size on the predicting accuracy (R-2) of the statistics model further confirmed the assumption that the surface elevation had scale-dependency characteristics. Therefore, according to the results presented in this study, the laser profiler is a promising rapid and non-destructive tool for assessing the surface porosity. (C) 2008 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 64
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Effects of soil water content during primary tillage -: laser measurements of soil surface changes
    Arvidsson, Johan
    Bolenius, Elisabeth
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2006, 90 (1-2) : 222 - 229
  • [2] The effect of soil aeration on superoxide dismutase activity, malondialdehyde level, pigment content and stomatal diffusive resistance in maize seedlings
    Bennicelli, RP
    Stepniewski, W
    Zakrzhevsky, DA
    Balakhnina, TI
    Stepniewska, Z
    Lipiec, J
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 1998, 39 (03) : 203 - 211
  • [3] TESTING ROUGHNESS INDEXES TO ESTIMATE SOIL SURFACE-ROUGHNESS CHANGES DUE TO SIMULATED RAINFALL
    BERTUZZI, P
    RAUWS, G
    COURAULT, D
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1990, 17 (1-2) : 87 - 99
  • [4] FLANAGAN DC, 1995, T ASAE, V38, P703, DOI 10.13031/2013.27883
  • [5] Govers G, 2000, AGRONOMIE, V20, P131, DOI 10.1051/agro:2000114
  • [6] Regionalized soil roughness indices
    Guillobez, S
    Arnaud, M
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1998, 45 (3-4) : 419 - 432
  • [7] GUPTA SC, 1993, P INT WORKSH IND MET, P379
  • [8] Roughness indices for estimation of depression storage capacity of tilled soil surfaces
    Hansen, B
    Schjonning, P
    Sibbesen, E
    [J]. SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 1999, 52 (1-2) : 103 - 111
  • [9] PORTABLE LASER SCANNER FOR MEASURING SOIL SURFACE-ROUGHNESS
    HUANG, CH
    BRADFORD, JM
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1990, 54 (05) : 1402 - 1406
  • [10] Predicting depressional storage from soil surface roughness
    Kamphorst, EC
    Jetten, V
    Guérif, J
    Pitkänen, J
    Iversen, BV
    Douglas, JT
    Paz, A
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (05) : 1749 - 1758