Social Support and the Religious Dimensions of Close Ties

被引:67
作者
Merino, Stephen M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Pan Amer, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Edinburg, TX 78539 USA
关键词
social support; social networks; religious homophily; religious salience; AMERICAN RELIGION; HEALTH; NETWORKS; IDENTITY; STRESS; INVOLVEMENT; INTEGRATION; RESOURCES;
D O I
10.1111/jssr.12134
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
Despite the influence of social support on physical and mental health, few studies have examined why some close ties are more supportive than others. Though religion provides a rich context for social interaction and a meaningful social identity, it has received little attention in the social support literature. A growing literature on religion and health offers insight into how religion affects social support processes. Using dyadic network data derived from the nationally representative 2006 Portraits of American Life Study, I examine how the religious dimensions of close, nonhousehold ties relate to provision of social support. Results from logistic regression analyses indicate that (controlling for a range of other social tie characteristics) same-faith ties are significantly more likely to be sources of help in times of need, while religious discussion is a strong predictor of receiving both help and advice. The effect of religious homophily is strongest for evangelical Protestants and African-American Protestants. My findings underscore the need for social support researchers to consider the role of religion in shaping support processes in close relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 612
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Diversity in social support by role relations: A typology [J].
Agneessens, Filip ;
Waege, Hans ;
Lievens, John .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2006, 28 (04) :427-441
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Social networks and health: models, methods, and applications
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SOCIAL SUPPORT PHYS, DOI DOI 10.12987/YALE/9780300102185.001.0001
[4]  
Barrera M., 2000, HDB COMMUNITY PSYCHO, P215, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_10, 10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_10]
[5]  
Berkman L.F., 2000, SOCIAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00065-4, DOI 10.1093/OSO/9780195083316.003.0007]
[6]   From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium [J].
Berkman, LF ;
Glass, T ;
Brissette, I ;
Seeman, TE .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2000, 51 (06) :843-857
[7]  
BRADLEY DE, 1995, J SCI STUD RELIG, V34, P259
[8]   Anomia and the sacred canopy: Testing a network theory [J].
Brashears, Matthew E. .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2010, 32 (03) :187-196
[9]   STRESS, SOCIAL SUPPORT, AND THE BUFFERING HYPOTHESIS [J].
COHEN, S ;
WILLS, TA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1985, 98 (02) :310-357
[10]   Social relationships and health [J].
Cohen, S .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2004, 59 (08) :676-684