Dose reconstruction for intensity-modulated radiation therapy using a non-iterative method and portal dose image

被引:13
作者
Yeo, Inhwan Jason [1 ]
Jung, Jae Won [1 ]
Chew, Meng [2 ]
Kim, Jong Oh [3 ]
Wang, Brian [4 ]
DiBiase, Steven [5 ]
Zhu, Yunping [1 ]
Lee, Dohyung [6 ]
机构
[1] Cooper Univ Hosp, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Camden, NJ 08103 USA
[2] Lehigh Univ, Emmaus, PA 18049 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[4] Univ Utah, Huntsman Canc Hosp, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[5] Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Delaware Valley Urol Canc Treatment Ctr, Radiat Oncol Serv, Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 USA
[6] Hanyang Univ, Ansan, South Korea
关键词
QUALITY-ASSURANCE; EPID DOSIMETRY; VERIFICATION; ALGORITHM; DISTRIBUTIONS; DEVICE; ARRAY; QA;
D O I
10.1088/0031-9155/54/17/010
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
A straightforward and accurate method was developed to verify the delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and to reconstruct the dose in a patient. The method is based on a computational algorithm that linearly describes the physical relationship between beamlets and dose-scoring voxels in a patient and the dose image from an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). The relationship is expressed in the form of dose response functions (responses) that are quantified using Monte Carlo (MC) particle transport techniques. From the dose information measured by the EPID the received patient dose is reconstructed by inversely solving the algorithm. The unique and novel non-iterative feature of this algorithm sets it apart from many existing dose reconstruction methods in the literature. This study presents the algorithm in detail and validates it experimentally for open and IMRT fields. Responses were first calculated for each beamlet of the selected fields by MC simulation. In-phantom and exit film dosimetry were performed on a flat phantom. Using the calculated responses and the algorithm, the exit film dose was used to inversely reconstruct the in-phantom dose, which was then compared with the measured in-phantom dose. The dose comparison in the phantom for all irradiated fields showed a pass rate of higher than 90% dose points given the criteria of dose difference of 3% and distance to agreement of 3 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:5223 / 5236
页数:14
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1990, Two Dimensional Signal And Image Processing
[2]  
Atkinson K., 1991, An Introduction To Numerical Analysis
[3]  
Barrett R., 1994, TEMPLATES SOLUTION L, DOI [DOI 10.1137/1.9781611971538, 10.1137/1.9781611971538]
[4]   Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm [J].
Fippel, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1999, 26 (08) :1466-1475
[5]   PORTAL DOSE MEASUREMENT IN RADIOTHERAPY USING AN ELECTRONIC PORTAL IMAGING DEVICE (EPID) [J].
HEIJMEN, BJM ;
PASMA, KL ;
KROONWIJK, M ;
ALTHOF, VGM ;
DEBOER, JCJ ;
VISSER, AG ;
HUIZENGA, H .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (11) :1943-1955
[6]   Delivery verification in sequential and helical tomotherapy [J].
Kapatoes, JM ;
Olivera, GH ;
Reckwerdt, PJ ;
Fitchard, EE ;
Schloesser, EA ;
Mackie, TR .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1999, 44 (07) :1815-1841
[7]   COMPREHENSIVE QA FOR RADIATION ONCOLOGY - REPORT OF AAPM RADIATION-THERAPY COMMITTEE TASK-GROUP-40 [J].
KUTCHER, GJ ;
COIA, L ;
GILLIN, M ;
HANSON, WF ;
LEIBEL, S ;
MORTON, RJ ;
PALTA, JR ;
PURDY, JA ;
REINSTEIN, LE ;
SVENSSON, GK ;
WELLER, M ;
WINGFIELD, L .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1994, 21 (04) :581-618
[8]   Evaluation of a 2D diode array for IMRT quality assurance [J].
Létourneau, D ;
Gulam, M ;
Yan, D ;
Oldham, M ;
Wong, JW .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 70 (02) :199-206
[9]   A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions [J].
Low, DA ;
Harms, WB ;
Mutic, S ;
Purdy, JA .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 25 (05) :656-661
[10]  
MCCURDY B, 2002, PHYS CAN, V58, P71