Remedial Modelling of Steel Bridges through Application of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)

被引:47
作者
Rashidi, Maria [1 ]
Ghodrat, Maryam [1 ]
Samali, Bijan [1 ]
Kendall, Brett [2 ]
Zhang, Chunwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Sydney, Ctr Infrastruct Engn, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia
[2] RMS, Werrington 2747, Australia
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2017年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
steel bridge; deterioration; remediation; asset management; decision support system; health monitoring; Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM); DECISION-MAKING METHODS; MANAGEMENT PART;
D O I
10.3390/app7020168
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The deterioration and failure of steel bridges around the world is of growing concern for asset managers and bridge engineers due to aging, increasing volume of traffic and introduction of heavier vehicles. Hence, a model that considers these heuristics can be employed to validate or challenge the practical engineering decisions. Moreover, in a time of increased litigation and economic unrest, engineers require a means of accountability to support their decisions. Maintenance, Repair and Rehabilitation (MR&R) of deteriorating bridge structures are considered as expensive actions for transportation agencies and the cost of error in decision making may aggravate problems related to infrastructure funding system. The subjective nature of decision making in this field could be replaced by the application of a Decision Support System (DSS) that supports asset managers through balanced consideration of multiple criteria. The main aim of this paper is to present the developed decision support system for asset management of steel bridges within acceptable limits of safety, functionality and sustainability. The Simplified Analytical Hierarchy Process S-AHP is applied as a multi criteria decision making technique. The model can serve as an integrated learning tool for novice engineers, or as an accountability tool for assurance to project stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Decision support method for multi-criteria selection of bridge rehabilitation strategy [J].
Abu Dabous, Saleh ;
Alkass, Sabah .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2008, 26 (08) :883-893
[2]   Deterioration Rates of Typical Bridge Elements in New York [J].
Agrawal, A. K. ;
Kawaguchi, A. ;
Chen, Z. .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (04) :419-429
[3]  
Ancich E., 2009, IABSE S IABSE BANGK, P11
[4]   The Analytical Hierarchy Process for contaminated land management [J].
Bello-Dambatta, A. ;
Farmani, R. ;
Javadi, A. A. ;
Evans, B. M. .
ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2009, 23 (04) :433-441
[5]  
Callister W D., 2018, Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction, V10th edn
[6]  
Cambridge Centre for Smart Infrastructure and Construction (CSIC), 2016, INN BRINGS OPP SMART
[7]  
Campbell FC., 2008, Elements of Metallurgy and Engineering Alloys
[8]   Development of a Technique to Improve Fatigue Lives of Crack-Stop Holes in Steel Bridges [J].
Crain, Josh S. ;
Simmons, Gary G. ;
Bennett, Caroline R. ;
Barrett-Gonzalez, Ron ;
Matamoros, Adolfo B. ;
Rolfe, Stanley T. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2010, (2200) :69-77
[9]   Time-variant reliability profiles for steel girder bridges [J].
Czarnecki, Artur A. ;
Nowak, Andrzej S. .
STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2008, 30 (01) :49-64
[10]   Comparison of two evolutionary algorithms for optimization of bridge deck repairs [J].
Elbehairy, Hatem ;
Elbeltagi, Emad ;
Hegazy, Tarek ;
Soudki, Khaled .
COMPUTER-AIDED CIVIL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2006, 21 (08) :561-572