Capability of non-destructive techniques in evaluating damage to composite sandwich structures

被引:10
作者
Belsky, Petr [1 ]
Kadlec, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] VZLU Czech Aerosp Res Ctr, Dept Strength Struct, Prague, Czech Republic
关键词
Aerospace; Sandwich; Carbon fibre-reinforced composite; Non-destructive testing; Ultrasonic; Laser shearography; SHEAROGRAPHIC NDT; C-SCAN; INSPECTION;
D O I
10.1108/IJSI-10-2018-0067
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose Defects can be caused by a number of factors, such as maintenance damage, ground handling and foreign objects thrown up from runways during an in-service use of composite aerospace structures. Sandwich structures are capable of absorbing large amounts of energy under impact loads, resulting in high structural crashworthiness. This situation is one of the many reasons why sandwich structures are extensively used in many aerospace applications nowadays. Their non-destructive inspection is often more complex. Hence, the choice of a suitable non-destructive testing (NDT) method can play a key role in successful damage detection. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach A comparison of detection capabilities of selected C-scan NDT methods applicable for inspections of sandwich structures was performed using water-squirt, air-coupled and pitch-catch (PC) ultrasonic techniques, supplemented by laser shearography (LS). Findings Test results showed that the water-squirt and PC techniques are the most suitable methods for core damage evaluation. Meanwhile, the air-coupled method showed lower sensitivity for the detection of several artificial defects and impact damage in honeycomb sandwiches when unfocussed transducers were used. LS can detect most of the defects in the panels, but it has lower sensitivity and resolution for honeycomb core-type sandwiches. Originality/value This study quantitatively compared the damage size indication capabilities of sandwich structures by using various NDT techniques. Results of the realised tests can be used for successful selection of a suitable NDT method. Combinations of the presented methods revealed most defects.
引用
收藏
页码:356 / 370
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Buckley J., 2000, P 15 WCNDT ROM 15 21
[2]  
Cawley P., 2006, ECNDT 2006
[3]  
Dickinson L. P., 2002, Acoustics Australia, V30, P93
[4]   Acoustic detection of invisible damage in aircraft composite panels [J].
Dickinson, L. P. ;
Fletcher, N. H. .
APPLIED ACOUSTICS, 2009, 70 (01) :110-119
[5]   Digital Shearography and Vibration Excitation for NDT of Aircraft Components [J].
Findeis, Dirk ;
Gryzagoridis, Jasson .
11TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON VIBRATION MEASUREMENTS BY LASER AND NONCONTACT TECHNIQUES - AIVELA 2014: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS, 2014, 1600 :33-38
[6]  
Gaal M., 2018, 12 EUR C NOND TEST G, P601
[7]   Benchmarking shearographic NDT for composites [J].
Gryzagoridis, J. ;
Findeis, D. .
INSIGHT, 2008, 50 (05) :249-252
[8]  
Heida J.H., 2013, 18 WORLD C NOND TEST
[9]   Sandwich structures technology in commercial aviation - Present applications and future trends [J].
Herrmann, AS ;
Zahlen, PC ;
Zuardy, I .
SANDWICH STRUCTURES7: ADVANCING WITH SANDWICH STRUCTURES AND MATERIALS, 2005, :13-26
[10]  
Hillger W., 2014, 11 EUR C NOND TEST E