Appropriate Telemedicine Utilization in Spine Surgery Results From a Delphi Study

被引:11
作者
Iyer, Sravisht [1 ]
Bovonratwet, Patawut [1 ]
Samartzis, Dino [2 ]
Schoenfeld, Andrew J. [3 ]
An, Howard S. [2 ]
Awwad, Waleed [4 ]
Blumenthal, Scott L. [5 ]
Cheung, Jason P. Y. [6 ]
Derman, Peter B. [5 ]
El-Sharkawi, Mohammad [7 ]
Freedman, Brett A. [8 ]
Hartl, Roger [9 ]
Kang, James D. [3 ]
Kim, Han Jo [1 ]
Louie, Philip K. [10 ]
Ludwig, Steven C. [11 ]
Neva, Marko H. [12 ]
Pham, Martin H. [13 ]
Phillips, Frank M. [2 ]
Qureshi, Sheeraz A. [1 ]
Radcliff, Kris E. [14 ]
Riew, K. Daniel [15 ]
Sandhu, Harvinder S. [1 ]
Sciubba, Daniel M. [16 ,17 ]
Sethi, Rajiv K. [18 ,19 ]
Valacco, Marcelo [20 ]
Zaidi, Hasan A. [21 ]
Zygourakis, Corinna C. [22 ]
Makhni, Melvin C. [3 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 535 East 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Rush Univ, Dept Orthoped Surg, Med Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] King Saud Univ, Orthoped Surg Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[5] Texas Back Inst, Dept Orthoped Surg, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Univ Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Traumatol, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[7] Assiut Univ, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma Surg, Med Sch, Assiut, Egypt
[8] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN USA
[9] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Weill Cornell Brain & Spine Ctr, Dept Neurol Surg, Weill Cornell Med, New York, NY USA
[10] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, Neurosci Inst, Seattle, WA USA
[11] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Orthopaed, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[12] Tampere Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed & Trauma, Tampere, Finland
[13] Univ Calif San Diego, Sch Med, Dept Neurosurg, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
[14] Thomas Jefferson Univ, Rothman Inst, Dept Orthoped Surg, 2500 English Creek Ave, Egg Harbor Township, NJ 08234 USA
[15] Columbia Univ, Spine Hosp NewYork Presbyterian, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[16] Northwell Hlth, Zucker Sch Med Hofstra, Dept Neurosurg, Long Isl Jewish Med Ctr, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[17] Northwell Hlth, North Shore Univ Hosp, Manhasset, NY 11030 USA
[18] Virginia Mason Med Ctr, 125 16th Ave East,CSB 3 Neurosurg, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[19] Univ Washington, 125 16th Ave East,CSB 3 Neurosurg, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[20] Hosp Churruca Visca, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[21] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[22] Stanford Univ, Dept Neurol Surg, 300 Pasteur Dr, Palo Alto, CA 94304 USA
关键词
appropriate use; consensus; Delphi; expert; spine surgery; telemedicine; utilization; CARE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000004339
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. Delphi expert panel consensus. Objective. To obtain expert consensus on best practices for appropriate telemedicine utilization in spine surgery. Summary of Background Data. Several studies have shown high patient satisfaction associated with telemedicine during the COVID-19 peak pandemic period as well as after easing of restrictions. As this technology will most likely continue to be employed, there is a need to define appropriate utilization. Methods. An expert panel consisting of 27 spine surgeons from various countries was assembled in February 2021. A two-round consensus-based Delphi method was used to generate consensus statements on various aspects of telemedicine (separated as video visits or audio visits) including themes, such as patient location and impact of patient diagnosis, on assessment of new patients. Topics with >= 75% agreement were categorized as having achieved a consensus. Results. The expert panel reviewed a total of 59 statements. Of these, 32 achieved consensus. The panel had consensus that video visits could be utilized regardless of patient location and that video visits are appropriate for evaluating as well as indicating for surgery multiple common spine pathologies, such as lumbar stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy, and cervical radiculopathy. Finally, the panel had consensus that video visits could be appropriate for a variety of visit types including early, midterm, longer term postoperative follow-up, follow-up for imaging review, and follow-up after an intervention (i.e., physical therapy, injection). Conclusion. Although telemedicine was initially introduced out of necessity, this technology most likely will remain due to evidence of high patient satisfaction and significant cost savings. This study was able to provide a framework for appropriate telemedicine utilization in spine surgery from a panel of experts. However, several questions remain for future research, such as whether or not an in-person consultation is necessary prior to surgery and which physical exam maneuvers are appropriate for telemedicine.
引用
收藏
页码:583 / 590
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [11] Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Standardizing the Spinal Physical Examination Using A Modified Delphi Method
    Haddad, Alexander F.
    Burke, John F.
    Mummaneni, Praveen, V
    Chan, Andrew K.
    Safaee, Michael M.
    Knightly, John J.
    Mayer, Rory R.
    Pennicooke, Brenton H.
    Digiorgio, Anthony M.
    Weinstein, Philip R.
    Clark, Aaron J.
    Chou, Dean
    Dhall, Sanjay S.
    [J]. NEUROSPINE, 2021, 18 (02) : 292 - 302
  • [12] Telemedicine in orthopaedics and its potential applications during COVID-19 and beyond: A systematic review
    Haider, Zakir
    Aweid, Bashaar
    Subramanian, Padmanabhan
    Iranpour, Farhad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2022, 28 (06) : 391 - 403
  • [13] Distance Management of Spinal Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond: Evidence-Based Patient and Clinician Guides From the Global Spine Care Initiative
    Haldeman, Scott
    Nordin, Margareta
    Tavares, Patricia
    Mullerpatan, Rajani
    Kopansky-Giles, Deborah
    Setlhare, Vincent
    Chou, Roger
    Hurwitz, Eric
    Treanor, Caroline
    Hartvigsen, Jan
    Schneider, Michael
    Gay, Ralph
    Moss, Jean
    Haldeman, Joan
    Gryfe, David
    Wilkey, Adam
    Brown, Richard
    Outerbridge, Geoff
    Eberspaecher, Stefan
    Carroll, Linda
    Engelbrecht, Reginald
    Graham, Kait
    Cashion, Nathan
    Ince, Stefanie
    Moon, Erin
    [J]. JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (02):
  • [14] Clinical effectiveness and cost analysis of patient referral by videoconferencing in orthopaedics
    Harno, K
    Arajärvi, E
    Paavola, T
    Carlson, C
    Viikinkoski, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TELEMEDICINE AND TELECARE, 2001, 7 (04) : 219 - 225
  • [15] TELEMEDICINE AND ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY: The COVID-19 Pandemic and Our New Normal
    Lanham, Nathan S.
    Bockelman, Kyle J.
    McCriskin, Brendan J.
    [J]. JBJS REVIEWS, 2020, 8 (07)
  • [16] Second opinion for degenerative spinal conditions: an option or a necessity? A prospective observational study
    Lenza, Mario
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Staples, Margaret P.
    dos Santos, Oscar F. P.
    Brandt, Reynaldo A.
    Lottenberg, Claudio L.
    Cendoroglo, Miguel
    Ferretti, Mario
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2017, 18
  • [17] Lien Brian V, 2020, Surg Neurol Int, V11, P365, DOI 10.25259/SNI_577_2020
  • [18] Patient Experiences of Telemedicine in Spine Care A Mixed Methods Study
    Lightsey, Harry M.
    Yeung, Caleb M.
    Bernstein, David N.
    Sumathipala, Marissa G.
    Chen, Antonia F.
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Makhni, Melvin C.
    [J]. SPINE, 2022, 47 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [19] Surgical plans generated from telemedicine visits are rarely changed after in-person evaluation in spine patients
    Lightsey, Harry M.
    Crawford, Alexander M.
    Xiong, Grace X.
    Schoenfeld, Andrew J.
    Simpson, Andrew K.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2021, 21 (03) : 359 - 365
  • [20] The Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Spine Surgeons Worldwide
    Louie, Philip K.
    Harada, Garrett K.
    McCarthy, Michael H.
    Germscheid, Niccole
    Cheung, Jason P. Y.
    Neva, Marko H.
    El-Sharkawi, Mohammad
    Valacco, Marcelo
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    Chutken, Norman B.
    An, Howard S.
    Samartzis, Dino
    [J]. GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 (05) : 534 - 552