Social equity and primary healthcare financing: lessons from New Zealand

被引:7
作者
Foley, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] Westcott Partners, 8705B Colesville Rd,293, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1071/PY17153
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper reviews the effect of a primary care financing scheme introduced in New Zealand as a component of the New Zealand Primary Health Care Strategy, a comprehensive reform of the way that primary healthcare was governed, financed and delivered. The population-based funding formulae incorporated an area-based measure of social deprivation and ethnicity in an explicit attempt to improve access to care for certain population groups and fund social interventions aimed at addressing conditions that lead to improved health outcomes. The New Zealand experience shows that introducing a nationwide, comprehensive program to improve access and reduce health disparities is possible. However, the effect of this effort on reducing health disparities is not entirely clear because success ultimately relies on local implementation of a complex set of interventions that need to be evaluated more rigorously. In addition, the partial subsidies for first contact care that came with the Strategy have been shown to improve access, but, the success of this approach relies on compliance by private-practising general practitioners with a fee reduction regimen, which is subject to local variation.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 303
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DEC DISP ETHN MORT T
[2]  
Atkinson June., 2014, NZDep2013 Index of Deprivation
[3]   The new Australian Primary Health Networks: how will they integrate public health and primary care? [J].
Booth, Mark ;
Hill, Graham ;
Moore, Michael J. ;
Dalla, Danielle ;
Moore, MichaelG ;
Messenger, Anne .
PUBLIC HEALTH RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2016, 26 (01)
[4]  
Breslin F., 2017, MED SOCIAL DETERMINA
[5]  
CBG Health Research Limited, 2004, CAR PLUS PROC REP
[6]  
Croxson B., 2009, Patient Fees as a Metaphor for so Much More in New Zealand's Primary Health Care System
[7]  
Cumming J, 2005, EVALUATION IMPLEMENT
[8]  
Cumming J., 2007, EVALUATION PRIMARY H
[9]  
Dowell A., 2009, EVALUATION PRIMARY M
[10]  
Marriott E, 2014, INDICATORS INEQUALIT