Comparison of PCR, culture and microscopy of blood smears for the diagnosis of anthrax in sheep and cattle

被引:15
作者
Berg, T.
Suddes, H.
Morrice, G.
Hornitzky, M.
机构
[1] New S Wales Dept Primary Ind, Elizabeth Macarthur Agr Inst, Menangle, NSW, Australia
[2] Murray Rural Lands Protect Board, Jerilderie, NSW, Australia
[3] Narrandera Rural Lands Protect Board, Narrandera, NSW, Australia
关键词
anthrax diagnosis; Bacillus anthracis; culture; microscopy; PCR;
D O I
10.1111/j.1472-765X.2006.01931.x
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Aims: To compare microscopy, culture and PCR for the diagnosis of anthrax in blood samples from sheep and cattle. Methods and Results: Blood samples were stored at room temperature and at 37 degrees C after receipt, over a period of 15-17 days. Aliquots were plated onto blood agar and blood smears were prepared. Following microscopic examination, DNA was extracted from blood smears and subjected to a multiplex PCR assay targeting the Ba813, cap and lef markers. Conclusions: PCR provided the most reliable means for the detection of Bacillus anthracis in deteriorating blood samples (15-17 days) and was also successful in diagnosing anthrax in blood smears that had been stored for 6 years and a blood sample which had been stored for 18 months at -20 degrees C. While less successful than PCR, culture for B. anthracis on 7% sheep blood agar was typically more reliable (2-17 days) than the examination of blood smears (2-6 days) for encapsulated bacilli. Significance and Impact of the Study: This work demonstrated the superiority of PCR for the diagnosis of anthrax from blood smear scrapings, particularly when microscopy is unreliable.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 186
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
*AN HLTH AUSTR, 2005, DIS STRAT ANTHR VERS
[2]  
Beyer W, 1996, SALISBURY MED B S, V87, P47
[3]   Real-time PCR assay for a unique chromosomal sequence of Bacillus anthracis [J].
Bode, E ;
Hurtle, W ;
Norwood, D .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2004, 42 (12) :5825-5831
[4]   SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION OF BACILLUS-ANTHRACIS BY MEANS OF A VARIANT BACTERIOPHAGE [J].
BROWN, ER ;
CHERRY, WB .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1955, 96 (01) :34-39
[5]   A simple and sensitive detection system for Bacillus anthracis in meat and tissue [J].
Cheun, HI ;
Makino, SI ;
Wataral, M ;
Shirahata, T ;
Uchida, I ;
Takeshi, K .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 91 (03) :421-426
[6]  
Ellerbrok H, 2002, FEMS MICROBIOL LETT, V214, P51, DOI 10.1016/S0378-1097(02)00837-6
[7]   Anthrax in cattle in southern Western Australia [J].
Forshaw, D ;
Higgs, ARB ;
Moir, DC ;
Ellis, TM ;
Links, IJ .
AUSTRALIAN VETERINARY JOURNAL, 1996, 74 (05) :391-393
[8]  
HORNITZKY MA, 2004, AUSTR NZ STANDARD DI
[9]   SELECTIVE MEDIUM FOR BACILLUS ANTHRACIS [J].
KNISELY, RF .
JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, 1966, 92 (03) :784-&
[10]   Identification of Bacillus anthracis by rpoB sequence analysis and multiplex PCR [J].
Ko, KS ;
Kim, JM ;
Kim, JW ;
Jung, BY ;
Kim, W ;
Kim, IJ ;
Kook, YH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (07) :2908-2914