Bolstering system-justifying beliefs in response to social exclusion

被引:12
作者
Hess, Yanine D. [1 ]
Ledgerwood, Alison [2 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Coll Purchase, Purchase, NY 10577 USA
[2] Univ Calif Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
just world beliefs; Protestant work ethic; rejection sensitivity; social exclusion; system justification; JUST-WORLD BELIEFS; SELF-ESTEEM; OSTRACISM; JUSTIFICATION; CONSEQUENCES; MERITOCRACY; REJECTION; ATTITUDES; MEDIATION; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1177/1368430213510572
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Integrating research on social exclusion with the broader literature on system justification and flexible responses to threats, we propose a novel coping strategy that individuals may use in the face of social exclusion. In particular, we suggest that because exclusion often feels unexpected, it will lead individuals to bolster the system-justifying worldview that people get what they deserve, as excluded individuals attempt to cognitively cope with the threatened order and predictability of their world. Supporting our prediction, in Study 1, social exclusion (vs. inclusion) led participants to increasingly endorse descriptive meritocratic beliefs suggesting that hard work leads to success in society. This effect was mediated by the perceived unexpectedness of the interaction outcome, providing key evidence for our hypothesized process. Study 2 used individual differences in rejection sensitivity to provide further support for our unexpectedness account, demonstrating that exclusion heightens meritocratic beliefs only insofar as participants tend to find exclusions unexpected. The results expand our understanding of the cognitive mechanisms by which people cope with social exclusion and highlight the malleability of system-justifying ideologies in response to interpersonal factors.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 508
页数:15
相关论文
共 74 条
[21]   Coping with threats to just-world beliefs: Derogate, blame, or help? [J].
Haynes, GA ;
Olson, JM .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 36 (03) :664-682
[22]   NOT ALL IDEOLOGIES ARE CREATED EQUAL: EPISTEMIC, EXISTENTIAL, AND RELATIONAL NEEDS PREDICT SYSTEM-JUSTIFYING ATTITUDES [J].
Hennes, Erin P. ;
Nam, H. Hannah ;
Stern, Chadly ;
Jost, John T. .
SOCIAL COGNITION, 2012, 30 (06) :669-688
[23]   The Merit of Meritocracy [J].
Hing, Leanne S. Son ;
Bobocel, D. Ramona ;
Zanna, Mark P. ;
Garcia, Donna M. ;
Gee, Stephanie S. ;
Orazietti, Katie .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) :433-450
[24]   Meritocracy and opposition to affirmative action: Making concessions in the face of discrimination [J].
Hing, LSS ;
Bobocel, DR ;
Zanna, MP .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2002, 83 (03) :493-509
[25]   SOCIAL CATEGORIZATION AND MEMORY FOR IN-GROUP AND OUT-GROUP BEHAVIOR [J].
HOWARD, JW ;
ROTHBART, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1980, 38 (02) :301-310
[26]   PERCEPTIONS OF SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR - EVIDENCE OF DIFFERING EXPECTATIONS FOR INTERPERSONAL AND INTERGROUP INTERACTION [J].
HOYLE, RH ;
PINKLEY, RL ;
INSKO, CA .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1989, 15 (03) :365-376
[27]  
Jost J. T., 2012, Handbook of theories of social psychology, P313, DOI [10.4135/9781446249222.n42, DOI 10.4135/9781446249222.N42]
[28]  
Jost J.T., 2002, European Review of Social Psychology, V13, P111, DOI [10.1080/10463280240000046, DOI 10.1080/10463280240000046]
[29]  
Jost J.T., 2010, PSYCHOL JUSTICE LEGI, V11, P173
[30]   Shared Reality, System Justification, and the Relational Basis of Ideological Beliefs [J].
Jost, John T. ;
Ledgerwood, Alison ;
Hardin, Curtis D. .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2008, 2 (01) :171-186