Human Dignity in Classical Chinese Philosophy: The Daoist Perspective

被引:3
作者
Zhang, Qianfan [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Law, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1540-6253.12047
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
This article discusses the Daoist contribution to the idea of human dignity in the classical Chinese philosophy, particularly in aspects that had been ignored by the Confucians and the Moists. By criticizing the traditional morality and reviving the faith in a primitive, self-sufficient life, Laozi and Zhuangzi add an important dimension to the classical understanding of human dignity: individual freedom, particularly the freedom of living under minimum burden, direction, and oppression of the state. By comparing the Daoist conception of human dignity with those of the Confucians and Moists, the article concludes that all three classical schools, if rationally construed, should support the view that the establishment of a liberal constitutional scheme is necessary to preserve and protect minimum/basic dignity in both physical and spiritual well-being of every human person who lives in a modern society.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 510
页数:18
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Benjamin I.Schwartz, 1985, WORLD THOUGHT ANCIEN, P187
  • [2] Chan Wing-tsit, 1963, SOURCE BOOK CHINESE, P311
  • [3] Cheng Chung-ying, 1991, NEW DIMENSIONS CONFU, P47
  • [4] Graham A. C., 1989, DISPUTERS TAO PHILOS, P216
  • [5] Lau D. C., 1982, TAO TE CHING, P115
  • [6] Lu Zhenyu, 1980, ZHONGGUO ZHENGZHI SI, P138
  • [7] Mote W.Frederick, 1971, INTELLECTUAL FDN CHI, P71
  • [8] Rousseau Jean-Jacques, 1984, DISCOURSE ORIGIN FDN, P24
  • [9] Shi Hu, 1969, ZHONGGUO ZHEXUE DAGA, V1, P32
  • [10] Tu W.M., 1979, Humanity and Self-Cultivation: Essays in Confucian thought