Valuable geoheritage resources: Potential versus exploitation

被引:35
作者
Ruban, Dmitry A. [1 ,2 ]
Mikhailenko, Anna, V [3 ]
Yashalova, Natalia N. [4 ]
机构
[1] KG Razumovsky Moscow State Univ Technol & Managem, Zemlyanoy Val St 73, Moscow 109004, Russia
[2] Southern Fed Univ, Higher Sch Business, Dept Org & Technol Serv Act, 23 Ja Linija St 43, Rostov Na Donu 344019, Russia
[3] Southern Fed Univ, Inst Earth Sci, Dept Phys Geog Ecol & Nat Protect, Zorge St 40, Rostov Na Donu 344090, Russia
[4] Cherepovets State Univ, Business Sch, Dept Econ & Management, Sovetskiy Ave 10, Cherepovets 162600, Vologda Region, Russia
关键词
Anthropogenic pressure; Geological resources; Geosite; Resources policy; Mountainous Adygeya; GEOLOGICAL HERITAGE; GEODIVERSITY; GEOCONSERVATION; GEOTOURISM; CONSERVATION; LEGISLATION; MANAGEMENT; EDUCATION; VALUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102665
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Geoheritage is an important geological resource, which can provide with various socio-economical benefits. Although much attention has been paid to its potential use, the actual patterns of this resource exploitation are yet to be fully understood. Mountainous Adygeya, a geologically-rich area of the Western Caucasus, is used for testing semi-quantitative, scoring-based approaches for documenting these patterns. It is established that the exploitation of the rich geoheritage resources of the study area remains limited, although the localities with the higher value tend to experience stronger exploitation. It appears that the geoheritage resources can be strongly heterogeneous in regard to their value and exploitation intensity. Presently, the anthropogenic pressure from this exploitation is chiefly low or moderate, but it may accelerate in the future. Development of special policy is necessary to make the geoheritage resource exploitation sustainable, and objectives, instruments, and functions of this policy are proposed.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Bedanokov M.K., 2020, HDB ENV CHEM, V106, P573
[2]  
Bedanokov M.K., 2020, Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, V106, P19, DOI DOI 10.1007/10.1007/6982020637
[3]   Geodiversity: An integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature [J].
Brilha, J. ;
Gray, M. ;
Pereira, D. I. ;
Pereira, P. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2018, 86 :19-28
[4]   Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: a Review [J].
Brilha, Jose .
GEOHERITAGE, 2016, 8 (02) :119-134
[5]   The "8Gs'-a blueprint for Geoheritage, Geoconservation, Geo-education and Geotourism [J].
Brocx, M. ;
Semeniuk, V. .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EARTH SCIENCES, 2019, 66 (06) :803-821
[6]   Paleogeography as geological heritage: Developing geosite classification [J].
Bruno, Delia Evelina ;
Crowley, Brooke E. ;
Gutak, Jaroslav M. ;
Moroni, Adriana ;
Nazarenko, Olesya V. ;
Oheim, Kathryn B. ;
Ruban, Dmitry A. ;
Tiess, Gueter ;
Zorina, Svetlana O. .
EARTH-SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2014, 138 :300-312
[7]   The National Heritage Resource Act (1999): Can legislation protect South Africa's rare geoheritage resources? [J].
Cairncross, Bruce .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2011, 36 (03) :204-213
[8]   Geodiversity Assessment as a First Step in Designating Areas of Geotourism Potential. Case Study: Western Carpathians [J].
Chrobak, Anna ;
Novotny, Jan ;
Strus, Pawel .
FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2021, 9
[9]   The Role of the Picturesque in Geotourism and Iconic Geotourist Landscapes [J].
Chylinska, Dagmara .
GEOHERITAGE, 2019, 11 (02) :531-543
[10]   Introducing New Guidelines on Geoheritage Conservation in Protected and Conserved Areas [J].
Crofts, Roger ;
Tormey, Dan ;
Gordon, John E. .
GEOHERITAGE, 2021, 13 (02)