The ecology of visual landscapes: Exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators

被引:214
作者
Fry, G. [1 ]
Tveit, M. S. [1 ]
Ode, A. [2 ]
Velarde, M. D. [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture & Spatial Planning, N-1432 As, Norway
[2] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Landscape Architecture, SE-23053 Alnarp, Sweden
[3] Rey Juan Carlos Univ Madrid, Sch Expt Sci & Technol, Madrid 28933, Spain
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
Indicator; Visual quality; Ecological; Landscape; Integrated; AESTHETIC APPRECIATION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; SPECIES RICHNESS; PATTERN INDEXES; SPATIAL-PATTERN; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; CONSEQUENCES; PREFERENCES; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2008.11.008
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
This paper explores the conceptual common ground between visual and ecological landscape indicators. indicators can be used to summarise complex information about landscape functions and the ability to extract a common set of indicators for analysing different landscape functions may provide valuable support for multiple-use planning. The development of landscape ecological indicators has been a very active research field that has resulted in a wide range of landscape metrics and composite indices with a strong conceptual base in landscape ecological principles. For the visual aspects of landscapes, however, this conceptual base is often missing and thus hindering progress in the development of indicators. This paper presents the results of an analysis of the correspondence between ecological indicators and visual indicators in order to explore whether there is common ground in both concept and operation. The conceptual level is presented for both ecological and visual indicators, as it is the concepts that define their aim and scope. We feel that transparency over this issue is crucial to the development and use of environmental indicators. The approach identified a candidate set of indicators that capture important aspects of both ecological and visual quality. The strength of the approach is that it forces us to focus on the identification of what we wish to indicate by means of landscape theory and assessment that are relevant to a specific landscape context. We believe that the approach presented here forms the basis for development of new methods for understanding the impact of landscape change in a management and planning context. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:933 / 947
页数:15
相关论文
共 114 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], LANDSC CHAR ASS GUID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1974, TOPOPHILIA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY TH
[5]  
APLET G, 2000, P RMRS P 15 USDA FOR, V2, P89
[6]  
Appleton J., 1975, The experience of landscape
[7]   The role of landscape structure in species richness distribution of birds, amphibians, reptiles and lepidopterans in Mediterranean landscapes [J].
Atauri, JA ;
de Lucio, JV .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2001, 16 (02) :147-159
[8]   Remote sensing and GIS in modeling visual landscape change: a case study of the northwestern and coast of Egypt [J].
Ayad, YA .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2005, 73 (04) :307-325
[9]   Landscape connectivity and animal behavior: functional grain as a key determinant for dispersal [J].
Baguette, Michel ;
Van Dyck, Hans .
LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2007, 22 (08) :1117-1129
[10]   Thematic resolution matters: Indicators of landscape pattern for European agro-ecosystems [J].
Bailey, Debra ;
Herzog, Felix ;
Augenstein, Isabel ;
Aviron, Stephanie ;
Billeter, Regula ;
Szerencsits, Erich ;
Baudry, Jacques .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2007, 7 (03) :692-709