Modeling the diffusion of complex innovations as a process of opinion formation through social networks

被引:12
作者
Assenova, Valentina A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Management Dept, Wharton Sch, 3620 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
DYNAMICS; EVOLUTION; ORIGINS; POWER;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0196699
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Complex innovations-ideas, practices, and technologies that hold uncertain benefits for potentialadopters-often vary in their ability to diffuse in different communities over time. To explain why, I develop a model of innovation adoption in which agents engage in naive (DeGroot) learning about the value of an innovation within their social networks. Using simulations on Bernoulli random graphs, I examine how adoption varies with network properties and with the distribution of initial opinions and adoption thresholds. The results show that: (i) low-density and high-asymmetry networks produce polarization in influence to adopt an innovation over time, (ii) increasing network density and asymmetry promote adoption under a variety of opinion and threshold distributions, and (iii) the optimal levels of density and asymmetry in networks depend on the distribution of thresholds: networks with high density (>0.25) and high asymmetry (>0.50) are optimal for maximizing diffusion when adoption thresholds are right-skewed (i.e., barriers to adoption are low), but networks with low density (<0.01) and low asymmetry (<0.25) are optimal when thresholds are left-skewed. I draw on data from a diffusion field experiment to predict adoption over time and compare the results to observed outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1962, DIFFUSION INNOVATION
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1968, An introduction to probability theory and its applications
[3]   Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks [J].
Aral, Sinan ;
Muchnik, Lev ;
Sundararajan, Arun .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (51) :21544-21549
[4]   Dynamics of political polarization [J].
Baldassarri, Delia ;
Bearman, Peter .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (05) :784-811
[5]   The Miracle of Microfinance? Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit ;
Duflo, Esther ;
Glennerster, Rachel ;
Kinnan, Cynthia .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC JOURNAL-APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2015, 7 (01) :22-53
[6]   The Diffusion of Microfinance [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit ;
Chandrasekhar, Arun G. ;
Duflo, Esther ;
Jackson, Matthew O. .
SCIENCE, 2013, 341 (6144) :363-+
[7]   Microcredit Under the Microscope: What Have We Learned in the Past Two Decades, and What Do We Need to Know? [J].
Banerjee, Abhijit Vinayak .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS, VOL 5, 2013, 5 :487-519
[8]   NEW PRODUCT GROWTH FOR MODEL CONSUMER DURABLES [J].
BASS, FM .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE SERIES A-THEORY, 1969, 15 (05) :215-227
[9]  
Blau P. M., 1977, Inequality and heterogeneity, V7
[10]   The Social Origins of Networks and Diffusion [J].
Centola, Damon .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 2015, 120 (05) :1295-1338