A qualitative analysis of implementing shared decision making in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services in the United Kingdom: Stages and facilitators

被引:40
作者
Abrines-Jaume, Neus [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Midgley, Nick [2 ,4 ]
Hopkins, Katy [1 ,2 ]
Hoffman, Jasmine [1 ,2 ]
Martin, Kate [5 ]
Law, Duncan [6 ]
Wolpert, Miranda [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] EBPU, Anna Freud Ctr, London NW3 5SU, England
[2] UCL, London, England
[3] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Hlth Serv Res & Policy, London WC1, England
[4] Anna Freud Ctr, London, England
[5] Common Room Consulting Ltd, London, England
[6] Child Outcomes Res Consortium, London, England
关键词
Shared decision making; child mental health; Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services; plan-do-study-act; implementation; PATIENT PREFERENCES; PARTICIPATION; PHYSICIANS; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/1359104514547596
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Objectives: To explore the implementation of shared decision making (SDM) in Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS), and identify clinician-determined facilitators to SDM. Methods: Professionals from four UK CAMHS tried a range of tools to support SDM. They reflected on their experiences using plan-do-study-act log books. A total of 23 professionals completed 307 logs, which were transcribed and analysed using Framework Analysis in Atlas.Ti. Results: Three states of implementation (apprehension, feeling clunky, and integration) and three aspects of clinician behavior or approach (effort, trust, and flexibility) were identified. Conclusions: Implementation of SDM in CAMHS requires key positive clinician behaviors, including preparedness to put in effort, trust in young people, and use of the approach flexibly. Practice implications: Implementation of SDM in CAMHS is effortful, and while tools may help support SDM, clinicians need to be allowed to use the tools flexibly to allow them to move from a state of apprehension through a sense of feeling clunky to integration in practice.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 31
页数:13
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Children's competence to consent to medical treatment [J].
Alderson, Priscilla ;
Sutcliffe, Katy ;
Curtis, Katherine .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2006, 36 (06) :25-34
[2]   What Motivates Family Physicians to Participate in Training Programs in Shared Decision Making? [J].
Allaire, Anne-Sophie ;
Labrecque, Michel ;
Giguere, Anik ;
Gagnon, Marie-Pierre ;
Legare, France .
JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2012, 32 (02) :98-107
[3]  
Bodenheimer T., 2005, HELPING PATIENTS MAN
[4]   Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review [J].
Chewning, Betty ;
Bylund, Carma L. ;
Shah, Bupendra ;
Arora, Neeraj K. ;
Gueguen, Jennifer A. ;
Makoul, Gregory .
PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2012, 86 (01) :9-18
[5]  
Costello Jan C, 2003, Ohio North Univ Law Rev, V29, P607
[6]   Implementing shared decision making in the UK [J].
Coulter, Angela ;
Edwards, Adrian ;
Elwyn, Glyn ;
Thomson, Richard .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR EVIDENZ FORTBILDUNG UND QUALITAET IM GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2011, 105 (04) :300-304
[7]   Consultation with children in hospital: children, parents' and nurses' perspectives [J].
Coyne, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2006, 15 (01) :61-71
[8]  
Da Silva D, 2012, Evidence: helping people share decision making: a review of evidence considering whether shared decision making is worthwhile
[9]  
Drake Robert E, 2009, Dialogues Clin Neurosci, V11, P455
[10]   A Demonstration Of Shared Decision Making In Primary Care Highlights Barriers To Adoption And Potential Remedies [J].
Friedberg, Mark W. ;
Van Busum, Kristin ;
Wexler, Richard ;
Bowen, Megan ;
Schneider, Eric C. .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2013, 32 (02) :268-275