Assessment of Preferences for Treatment: Validation of a Measure

被引：129

作者：

Sidani, Souraya ^{[1
]}

Epstein, Dana R. ^{[2
]}

Bootzin, Richard R. ^{[3
]}

Moritz, Patricia ^{[4
]}

Miranda, Joyal ^{[5
]}

机构：

[1] Ryerson Univ, Sch Nursing, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada

[2] Phoenix Vet Affairs Hlth Care Syst, Phoenix, AZ USA

[3] Univ Arizona, Dept Psychol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA

[4] Univ Colorado, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Nursing, Denver, CO 80262 USA

[5] Univ Toronto, Fac Nursing, Toronto, ON, Canada

来源：

RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH | 2009年 / 32卷 / 04期

基金：

美国国家卫生研究院;

关键词：

preference; acceptability; measurement; reliability; validity; chronic insomnia; behavioral treatments; treatment attributes; clinical trial; PATIENT PREFERENCES; ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; TREATMENT CHOICE; CLINICAL-TRIALS; CARE; INSOMNIA; DEPRESSION; QUALITY; RANDOMIZATION; CANCER;

D O I：

10.1002/nur.20329

中图分类号：

R47 [护理学];

学科分类号：

1011 ;

摘要：

Systematic measurement of treatment Preferences is needed to obtain well-informed Preferences. Guided by a conceptualization of treatment Preferences, a measure was developed to assess treatment acceptability and preference. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the treatment acceptability and preferences (TAP) measure. The TAP measure contains a description of each treatment under evaluation, items to rate its acceptability, and questions about participants' preferred treatment option. The items measuring treatment acceptability were internally consistent (alpha > .80) and demonstrated validity, evidenced by a one-factor structure and differences in the scores between participants with preferences for particular interventions. The TAP measure has the potential for the assessment of acceptability and preferences for various behavioral interventions. (C) 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 32:419-431, 2009

引用

页码：419 / 431

页数：13

共 64 条

[21] Ethnicity and preferences for depression treatment
Givens, Jane L.
Houston, Thomas K.
Van Voorhees, Benjamin W.
Ford, Daniel E.
Cooper, Lisa A.
[J]. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2007, 29 (03) : 182 - 191
[22] Guentner K, 2006, AM J CRIT CARE, V15, P65
[23] Depression treatment preferences in older primary care patients
Gum, AM
Areán, PA
Hunkeler, E
Tang, LQ
Katon, W
Hitchcock, P
Steffens, DC
Dickens, J
Unützer, J
[J]. GERONTOLOGIST, 2006, 46 (01) : 14 - 22
[24] Predictors of willingness to consider medication and psychosocial treatment for panic disorder in primary care patients
Hazlett-Stevens, H
Craske, MG
Roy-Byrne, PP
Sherbourne, CD
Stein, MB
Bystritsky, A
[J]. GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 24 (05) : 316 - 321
[25] Predicting treatment choice for patients with pelvic organ prolapse
Heit, M
Rosenquist, C
Culligan, P
Graham, C
Murphy, M
Shott, S
[J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 101 (06) : 1279 - 1284
[26] Patient preference randomised controlled trials in mental health research
Howard, L
Thornicroft, G
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 188 : 303 - 304
[27] Offering a choice between two adjuvant chemotherapy regimens: a pilot study to develop a decision aid for women with breast cancer
Irwin, E
Arnold, A
Whelan, TJ
Reyno, LM
Cranton, P
[J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 1999, 37 (03) : 283 - 291
[28] Comparative meta-analysis of behavioral interventions for insomnia and their efficacy in middle-aged adults and in older adults 55+years of age
Irwin, MR
Cole, JC
Nicassio, PM
[J]. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 25 (01) : 3 - 14
[29] The role of choice in health education intervention trials: a review and case study
Janevic, MR
Janz, NK
Dodge, JA
Lin, XH
Pan, WQ
Sinco, BR
Clark, NM
[J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (07) : 1581 - 1594
[30] Patients' preferences for adjuvant chemotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: is treatment worthwhile?
Jansen, SJT
Kievit, J
Nooij, MA
de Haes, JCJM
Overpelt, IME
van Slooten, H
Maartense, E
Stiggelbout, AM
[J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2001, 84 (12) : 1577 - 1585

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 →