Predicting postural control adaptation measuring EEG, EMG, and center of pressure changes: BioVRSea paradigm

被引:1
|
作者
Stehle, Simon A. A. [1 ]
Aubonnet, Romain [1 ]
Hassan, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Recenti, Marco [1 ]
Jacob, Deborah [1 ]
Petersen, Hannes [3 ,4 ]
Gargiulo, Paolo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Reykjavik Univ, Inst Biomed & Neural Engn, Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] MINDig, Rennes, France
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Anat, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Akureyri Hosp, Akureyri, Iceland
[5] Natl Univ Hosp Iceland, Dept Sci, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
postural control; machine learning; virtual reality; EEG; EMG; center of pressure; ATTENTION; STABILITY; AGE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2022.1038976
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Postural control is a sensorimotor mechanism that can reveal neurophysiological disorder. The present work studies the quantitative response to a complex postural control task.Methods: We measure electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and center of pressure (CoP) signals during a virtual reality (VR) experience called BioVRSea with the aim of classifying different postural control responses. The BioVRSea paradigm is based on six different phases where motion and visual stimulation are modulated throughout the experiment, inducing subjects to a different adaptive postural control strategy. The goal of the study is to assess the predictability of those responses. During the experiment, brain activity was recorded from a 64-channel EEG, muscle activity was determined with six wireless EMG sensors placed on lower leg muscles, and individual movement measured by the CoP. One-hundred and seventy-two healthy individuals underwent the BioVRSea paradigm and 318 features were extracted from each phase of the experiment. Machine learning techniques were employed to: (1) classify the phases of the experiment; (2) assess the most notable features; and (3) identify a quantitative pattern for healthy responses.Results: The results show that the EEG features are not sufficient to predict the distinct phases of the experiment, but they can distinguish visual and motion onset stimulation. EMG features and CoP features, when used jointly, can predict five out of six phases with a mean accuracy of 74.4% (+/- 8%) and an AUC of 0.92. The most important feature to identify the different adaptive strategies is the Squared Root Mean Distance of points on Medio-Lateral axis (RDIST_ML).Discussion: This work shows the importance and the feasibility of a quantitative evaluation in a complex postural control task and demonstrates the potential of EEG, CoP, and EMG for assessing pathological conditions. These predictive systems pave the way for developing an objective assessment of pathological behavior PC responses. This will be a first step in identifying individual disorders and treatment options.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [31] Is a portable pressure plate an alternative to force plates for measuring postural stability and interlimb coordination of quiet standing balance control?
    Schroder, Jonas
    Hallemans, Ann
    Saeys, Wim
    Yperzeele, Laetitia
    Kwakkel, Gert
    Truijen, Steven
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION AND ASSISTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ENGINEERING, 2024, 11
  • [32] RELIABILITY OF CENTER OF PRESSURE-BASED MEASURES DURING DUAL-TASK POSTURAL CONTROL TESTING IN A YOUTH POPULATION
    Campolettano, Eamon T.
    Madigan, Michael L.
    Rowson, Steven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2020, 15 (06): : 1036 - 1043
  • [33] Changes in Standing Postural Control Ability in a Case of Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 31 With Physical Therapy Focusing on the Center of Gravity Sway Variables and Lower Leg Muscle Activity
    Iwasa, Shiori
    Akaguchi, Ryo
    Okuno, Hiroyuki
    Nakanishi, Koji
    Ueta, Kozo
    Morioka, Shu
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [34] Do changes in dynamic plantar pressure distribution, strength capacity and postural control after intra-articular calcaneal fracture correlate with clinical and radiological outcome?
    Hirschmueller, Anja
    Konstantinidis, Lukas
    Baur, Heiner
    Mueller, Steffen
    Mehlhorn, Alexander
    Kontermann, Julia
    Grosse, Ulrich
    Suedkamp, N. P.
    Helwig, Peter
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (10): : 1135 - 1143