Predicting postural control adaptation measuring EEG, EMG, and center of pressure changes: BioVRSea paradigm

被引:1
|
作者
Stehle, Simon A. A. [1 ]
Aubonnet, Romain [1 ]
Hassan, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Recenti, Marco [1 ]
Jacob, Deborah [1 ]
Petersen, Hannes [3 ,4 ]
Gargiulo, Paolo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Reykjavik Univ, Inst Biomed & Neural Engn, Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] MINDig, Rennes, France
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Anat, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Akureyri Hosp, Akureyri, Iceland
[5] Natl Univ Hosp Iceland, Dept Sci, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
postural control; machine learning; virtual reality; EEG; EMG; center of pressure; ATTENTION; STABILITY; AGE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2022.1038976
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Postural control is a sensorimotor mechanism that can reveal neurophysiological disorder. The present work studies the quantitative response to a complex postural control task.Methods: We measure electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and center of pressure (CoP) signals during a virtual reality (VR) experience called BioVRSea with the aim of classifying different postural control responses. The BioVRSea paradigm is based on six different phases where motion and visual stimulation are modulated throughout the experiment, inducing subjects to a different adaptive postural control strategy. The goal of the study is to assess the predictability of those responses. During the experiment, brain activity was recorded from a 64-channel EEG, muscle activity was determined with six wireless EMG sensors placed on lower leg muscles, and individual movement measured by the CoP. One-hundred and seventy-two healthy individuals underwent the BioVRSea paradigm and 318 features were extracted from each phase of the experiment. Machine learning techniques were employed to: (1) classify the phases of the experiment; (2) assess the most notable features; and (3) identify a quantitative pattern for healthy responses.Results: The results show that the EEG features are not sufficient to predict the distinct phases of the experiment, but they can distinguish visual and motion onset stimulation. EMG features and CoP features, when used jointly, can predict five out of six phases with a mean accuracy of 74.4% (+/- 8%) and an AUC of 0.92. The most important feature to identify the different adaptive strategies is the Squared Root Mean Distance of points on Medio-Lateral axis (RDIST_ML).Discussion: This work shows the importance and the feasibility of a quantitative evaluation in a complex postural control task and demonstrates the potential of EEG, CoP, and EMG for assessing pathological conditions. These predictive systems pave the way for developing an objective assessment of pathological behavior PC responses. This will be a first step in identifying individual disorders and treatment options.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] Effects of visual center of pressure feedback on postural control in young and elderly healthy adults and in stroke patients
    Dault, MC
    de Haart, M
    Geurts, ACH
    Arts, IMP
    Nienhuis, B
    HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 22 (03) : 221 - 236
  • [22] Assessment of differenced center of pressure time series improves detection of age-related changes in postural coordination
    Strang, Adam J.
    DiDomenico, Angela
    Berg, William P.
    McGorry, Raymond W.
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2013, 38 (02) : 345 - 348
  • [23] Standing postural control during an upper limb reaching task in a mixed reality condition: analysis of center of pressure and lower limb muscle activities
    Yunhe Zhang
    Amiri Matsumoto
    Chihiro Oshima
    Kenta Sakamoto
    Takashi Sugiyama
    Nan Liang
    Virtual Reality, 29 (3)
  • [24] Center-of-pressure regularity as a marker for attentional investment in postural control: A comparison between sitting and standing postures
    Roerdink, Melvyn
    Hlavackova, Petra
    Vuillerme, Nicolas
    HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2011, 30 (02) : 203 - 212
  • [25] Multisensory information for postural control: sway-referencing gain shapes center of pressure variability and temporal dynamics
    Clark, Sean
    Riley, Michael A.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 176 (02) : 299 - 310
  • [26] Postural Control under Cognitive Load: Evidence of Increased Automaticity Revealed by Center-of-Pressure and Head Kinematics
    Lubetzky, Anat, V
    Coker, Elizabeth
    Arie, Liraz
    Aharoni, Moshe M. H.
    Krasovsky, Tal
    JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 2022, 54 (04) : 466 - 479
  • [27] Multisensory information for postural control: sway-referencing gain shapes center of pressure variability and temporal dynamics
    Sean Clark
    Michael A. Riley
    Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 176 : 299 - 310
  • [28] Reliability of center of pressure excursion as a measure of postural control in bipedal stance of individuals with intellectual disability: A pilot study
    Pineda, Roi Charles
    Krampe, Ralf Th
    Vanlandewijck, Yves
    Van Biesen, Debbie
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [29] Adaptation changes in dynamic postural control and contingent negative variation during backward disturbance by transient floor translation in the elderly
    Fujiwara, Katsuo
    Maekawa, Maki
    Kiyota, Naoe
    Yaguchi, Chie
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2012, 31 : 12
  • [30] Center of pressure plausibility for the double-link human stance model under the intermittent control paradigm
    Tigrini, Andrea
    Verdini, Federica
    Fioretti, Sandro
    Mengarelli, Alessandro
    JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2021, 128