Predicting postural control adaptation measuring EEG, EMG, and center of pressure changes: BioVRSea paradigm

被引:1
|
作者
Stehle, Simon A. A. [1 ]
Aubonnet, Romain [1 ]
Hassan, Mahmoud [1 ,2 ]
Recenti, Marco [1 ]
Jacob, Deborah [1 ]
Petersen, Hannes [3 ,4 ]
Gargiulo, Paolo [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Reykjavik Univ, Inst Biomed & Neural Engn, Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] MINDig, Rennes, France
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Med, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Anat, Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Akureyri Hosp, Akureyri, Iceland
[5] Natl Univ Hosp Iceland, Dept Sci, Landspitali, Reykjavik, Iceland
来源
FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
postural control; machine learning; virtual reality; EEG; EMG; center of pressure; ATTENTION; STABILITY; AGE;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2022.1038976
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Introduction: Postural control is a sensorimotor mechanism that can reveal neurophysiological disorder. The present work studies the quantitative response to a complex postural control task.Methods: We measure electroencephalography (EEG), electromyography (EMG), and center of pressure (CoP) signals during a virtual reality (VR) experience called BioVRSea with the aim of classifying different postural control responses. The BioVRSea paradigm is based on six different phases where motion and visual stimulation are modulated throughout the experiment, inducing subjects to a different adaptive postural control strategy. The goal of the study is to assess the predictability of those responses. During the experiment, brain activity was recorded from a 64-channel EEG, muscle activity was determined with six wireless EMG sensors placed on lower leg muscles, and individual movement measured by the CoP. One-hundred and seventy-two healthy individuals underwent the BioVRSea paradigm and 318 features were extracted from each phase of the experiment. Machine learning techniques were employed to: (1) classify the phases of the experiment; (2) assess the most notable features; and (3) identify a quantitative pattern for healthy responses.Results: The results show that the EEG features are not sufficient to predict the distinct phases of the experiment, but they can distinguish visual and motion onset stimulation. EMG features and CoP features, when used jointly, can predict five out of six phases with a mean accuracy of 74.4% (+/- 8%) and an AUC of 0.92. The most important feature to identify the different adaptive strategies is the Squared Root Mean Distance of points on Medio-Lateral axis (RDIST_ML).Discussion: This work shows the importance and the feasibility of a quantitative evaluation in a complex postural control task and demonstrates the potential of EEG, CoP, and EMG for assessing pathological conditions. These predictive systems pave the way for developing an objective assessment of pathological behavior PC responses. This will be a first step in identifying individual disorders and treatment options.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Postural control paradigm (BioVRSea): towards a neurophysiological signature
    Aubonnet, R.
    Shoykhet, A.
    Jacob, D.
    Di Lorenzo, G.
    Petersen, H.
    Gargiulo, P.
    PHYSIOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2022, 43 (11)
  • [2] Regularity of center-of-pressure trajectories depends on the amount of attention invested in postural control
    Donker, Stella F.
    Roerdink, Melvyn
    Greven, An J.
    Beek, Peter J.
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2007, 181 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [3] Analysis of oscillations of the center of pressure in postural control
    Gherghel, Carmen Liliana
    Teodorescu, Virgil
    Iordan, Daniel Andrei
    Sardaru, Dragos-Petrica
    Onu, Ilie
    BALNEO AND PRM RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2024, 15 (02):
  • [4] Nonlinear dynamics of postural control system under visual-vestibular habituation balance practice: evidence from EEG, EMG and center of pressure signals
    Hua, Anke
    Wang, Guozheng
    Bai, Jingyuan
    Hao, Zengming
    Liu, Jun
    Meng, Jun
    Wang, Jian
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 18
  • [5] Adaptation effects in static postural control by providing simultaneous visual feedback of center of pressure and center of gravity
    Takeda, Kenta
    Mani, Hiroki
    Hasegawa, Naoya
    Sato, Yuki
    Tanaka, Shintaro
    Maejima, Hiroshi
    Asaka, Tadayoshi
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2017, 36
  • [6] Adaptation effects in static postural control by providing simultaneous visual feedback of center of pressure and center of gravity
    Kenta Takeda
    Hiroki Mani
    Naoya Hasegawa
    Yuki Sato
    Shintaro Tanaka
    Hiroshi Maejima
    Tadayoshi Asaka
    Journal of Physiological Anthropology, 36
  • [7] Regularity of center-of-pressure trajectories depends on the amount of attention invested in postural control
    Stella F. Donker
    Melvyn Roerdink
    An J. Greven
    Peter J. Beek
    Experimental Brain Research, 2007, 181 : 1 - 11
  • [8] Portable technology for postural control measurement: Comparing head position with center of pressure data
    Harel, Daphna
    Lubetzky, Anat Vilnai
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2024, 32 (05) : 2965 - 2979
  • [9] Center-of-pressure parameters used in the assessment of postural control
    Palmieri, RM
    Ingersoll, CD
    Stone, MB
    Krause, BA
    JOURNAL OF SPORT REHABILITATION, 2002, 11 (01) : 51 - 66
  • [10] Estimation of center of pressure information by smartphone sensors for postural control training
    Huang, Rui
    Kaminishi, Kohei
    Hasegawa, Tetsuya
    Yozu, Arito
    Chiba, Ryosuke
    Ota, Jun
    2023 45TH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE & BIOLOGY SOCIETY, EMBC, 2023,