The normal hip joint space: variations in width, shape, and architecture on 223 pelvic radiographs

被引:102
作者
Lequesne, M
Malghem, J
Dion, E
机构
[1] Hop Leopold Bellan, Serv Rhumatol, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Clin Univ St Luc, Dept Imagerie Med, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop La Pitie Salpetriere, Dept Radiol, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
D O I
10.1136/ard.2003.018424
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To determine the range of normal radiographic joint space width (JSW) values and the shape of the normal hip, and the influence of age, sex, dysplasia, coxa profunda, and acetabular roof curve abnormalities on these values. Methods: On routine conventional pelvic radiographs taken in the supine position in patients with no history of hip or lumbar pain, JSW was measured at three points ( superolateral, apical, superomedial), together with the VCE, HTE, and neck shaft angles; acetabular depth; and femoral head diameter. Results: 223 radiographs ( 446 hips) from 127 women and 96 men ( mean age 51.3 years) were examined. Interindividual variations in JSW were large ( apical site: 4.19 (0.92) mm; range 2 - 7). Mean JSW values were higher at the superolateral site than at the apical and superomedial sites in nearly 80% of cases. Women had lower JSW values than men. JSW values did not fall with age. Marked right/left JSW asymmetry was seen in 13/221 (5.9%) subjects. Eight cases of acetabular dysplasia ( 7 unilateral) and 16 cases of coxa profunda were found, but no cases of acetabular protrusion. The JSW was thicker in dysplastic hips, and thinner in hips with coxa profunda. A roof curve abnormality was found in 96/446 (21.5%) hips. Conclusions: Normal JSW values vary widely; the JSW is commonly narrower at the superomedial site than at the apical site, and is sometimes asymmetric. The roof curve is dysmorphic in about 20% of patients. These findings may have important implications for epidemiological studies and early diagnosis of osteoarthritis of the hip.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1151
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[11]   The radiographic joint space width in clinically normal hips: effects of age, gender and physical parameters [J].
Goker, B ;
Sancak, A ;
Arac, M ;
Shott, S ;
Block, JA .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2003, 11 (05) :328-334
[12]  
HART DJ, 1995, J RHEUMATOL, V22, P46
[13]   Radiographic evaluation of the lumbosacral disc height [J].
Inoue, H ;
Ohmori, K ;
Miyasaka, K ;
Hosoe, H .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (11) :638-643
[14]   Age and sex differences in hip joint space among asymptomatic subjects without structural change - Implications for epidemiologic studies [J].
Lanyon, P ;
Muir, K ;
Doherty, S ;
Doherty, M .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 2003, 48 (04) :1041-1046
[15]  
LEQUESNE M, 1972, Economie et Medecine Animales, V13, P197
[16]   Description of the potential of an arthrometer for standard and reduced radiographs suitable to measurement of angles and segments of hip, knee, foot and joint space widths [J].
Lequesne, M ;
Morvan, G .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2002, 69 (03) :282-292
[17]   The faux profil (oblique view) of the hip in the standing position. Contribution to the evaluation of osteoarthritis of the adult hip [J].
Lequesne, MG ;
Laredo, JD .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1998, 57 (11) :676-681
[18]  
LINDBERG H, 1984, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V191, P159
[19]  
Maetzel A, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P1599
[20]   AETIOLOGY OF PRIMARY OSTEOARTHRITIS OF HIP [J].
MURRAY, RO .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1965, 38 (455) :810-&