A nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading of clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer among Chinese patients

被引:19
|
作者
Wang, Jin-You [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chao-Fu [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Shi-Lin [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Ding-Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; nomograms; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOPSY; RADIOTHERAPY; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.5732/cjc.013.10137
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although several models have been developed to predict the probability of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens, most of these models are restricted to prostate-specific antigen screening-detected prostate cancer. This study aimed to build a nomogram for the prediction of Gleason sum upgrading in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer. The study cohort comprised 269 Chinese prostate cancer patients who underwent prostate biopsy with a minimum of 10 cores and were subsequently treated with radical prostatectomy. Of all included patients, 220 (81.8%) were referred with clinical symptoms. The prostate-specific antigen level, primary and secondary biopsy Gleason scores, and clinical T category were used in a multivariate logistic regression model to predict the probability of Gleason sum upgrading. The developed nomogram was validated internally. Gleason sum upgrading was observed in 90 (33.5%) patients. Our nomogram showed a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.789 and good calibration using 4 readily available variables. The nomogram also demonstrated satisfactory statistical performance for predicting significant upgrading. External validation of the nomogram published by Chun et al. in our cohort showed a marked discordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of Gleason sum upgrading. In summary, a new nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer was developed, and it demonstrated good statistical performance upon internal validation.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Evaluating prostate cancer mortality and competing risks of death in patients with localized prostate cancer using a comprehensive nomogram
    Kutikov, A.
    Cooperberg, M. R.
    Paciorek, A. T.
    Uzzo, R. G.
    Carroll, P. R.
    Boorjian, S. A.
    PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES, 2012, 15 (04) : 374 - 379
  • [22] Risk Grouping Versus Risk Continuum in Patients With Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer: A Taxometric Test
    Ingram, David G.
    Kattan, Michael W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (05) : 1937 - 1941
  • [23] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3 + 4
    Hwanik Kim
    Jung Kwon Kim
    Sung Kyu Hong
    Chang Wook Jeong
    Ja Hyeon Ku
    Cheol Kwak
    World Journal of Urology, 2021, 39 : 1825 - 1830
  • [24] Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer
    Horiguchi, A
    Nakashima, J
    Horiguchi, Y
    Nakagawa, K
    Oya, M
    Ohigashi, T
    Marumo, K
    Murai, M
    PROSTATE, 2003, 56 (01) : 23 - 29
  • [25] An abnormal digital rectal examination is an independent predictor of high radical prostatectomy Gleason's score (≥7) in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Ugurlu, Ozgur
    Cetinkaya, Mesut
    Ozden, Cuneyt
    Oztekin, C. Volkan
    Akdemir, A. Ozgur
    Memis, Ali
    Yaris, Mehmet
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 39 (05) : 755 - 760
  • [26] Androgen-deprivation therapy versus radical prostatectomy as monotherapy among clinically localized prostate cancer patients
    Liu, Jinan
    Shi, Lizheng
    Sartor, Oliver
    Culbertson, Richard
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2013, 6 : 725 - 732
  • [27] Standard versus extended pelvic lymphadenectomy in the patients with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Bogdanovic, Jovo
    Sekulic, Vuk
    Trivunic-Dajko, Sandra
    Herin, Ranko
    Djozic, Senjin
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2019, 76 (09) : 929 - 934
  • [28] Identifying men diagnosed with clinically localized prostate cancer who are at high risk for death from prostate cancer
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Hui-Chen, Ming
    Renshaw, Andrew A.
    Sussman, Brenda
    Roehl, Kimberly A.
    Catalona, William J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (06) : S11 - S15
  • [29] PSA density is superior than PSA and Gleason score for adverse pathologic features prediction in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer
    Sfoungaristos, Stavros
    Perimenis, Petros
    CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2012, 6 (01): : 46 - 50
  • [30] Role of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging to predict postoperative Gleason score upgrading in prostate cancer with Gleason score 3+4
    Kim, Hwanik
    Kim, Jung Kwon
    Hong, Sung Kyu
    Jeong, Chang Wook
    Ku, Ja Hyeon
    Kwak, Cheol
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2021, 39 (06) : 1825 - 1830