A nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading of clinically diagnosed localized prostate cancer among Chinese patients

被引:19
|
作者
Wang, Jin-You [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Chao-Fu [1 ,3 ]
Zhang, Shi-Lin [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Bo [1 ,2 ]
Ye, Ding-Wei [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Shanghai Med Coll, Dept Oncol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[2] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Urol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
[3] Fudan Univ, Canc Hosp, Dept Pathol, Shanghai 200032, Peoples R China
关键词
Prostatic neoplasms; neoplasm staging; nomograms; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; BIOPSY; RADIOTHERAPY; PROBABILITY;
D O I
10.5732/cjc.013.10137
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Although several models have been developed to predict the probability of Gleason sum upgrading between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens, most of these models are restricted to prostate-specific antigen screening-detected prostate cancer. This study aimed to build a nomogram for the prediction of Gleason sum upgrading in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer. The study cohort comprised 269 Chinese prostate cancer patients who underwent prostate biopsy with a minimum of 10 cores and were subsequently treated with radical prostatectomy. Of all included patients, 220 (81.8%) were referred with clinical symptoms. The prostate-specific antigen level, primary and secondary biopsy Gleason scores, and clinical T category were used in a multivariate logistic regression model to predict the probability of Gleason sum upgrading. The developed nomogram was validated internally. Gleason sum upgrading was observed in 90 (33.5%) patients. Our nomogram showed a bootstrap-corrected concordance index of 0.789 and good calibration using 4 readily available variables. The nomogram also demonstrated satisfactory statistical performance for predicting significant upgrading. External validation of the nomogram published by Chun et al. in our cohort showed a marked discordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of Gleason sum upgrading. In summary, a new nomogram to predict Gleason sum upgrading in clinically diagnosed prostate cancer was developed, and it demonstrated good statistical performance upon internal validation.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictive Factors of Gleason Score Upgrading in Localized and Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Diagnosed by Prostate Biopsy
    Moon, Seung Jin
    Park, Sung Yul
    Lee, Tchun Yong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 51 (10) : 677 - 682
  • [2] Independent external validation of nomogram to predict extracapsular extension in patients with prostate cancer
    Alves, Joao Ricardo
    Muglia, Valdair F.
    Lucchesi, Fabiano R.
    Faria, Raisa A. O. G.
    Alcantara-Quispe, Cinthia
    Vazquez, Vinicius L.
    Reis, Rodolfo B.
    Faria, Eliney F.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (09) : 5004 - 5010
  • [3] Biopsy Core Number Represents One of Foremost Predictors of Clinically Significant Gleason Sum Upgrading in Patients With Low-risk Prostate Cancer
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Valiquette, Luc
    Perrotte, Paul
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Briganti, Alberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Cestari, Andrea
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Salonia, Andrea
    Montorsi, Francesco
    UROLOGY, 2009, 73 (05) : 1087 - 1091
  • [4] Prostate Size as a Predictor of Gleason Score Upgrading in Patients With Low Risk Prostate Cancer
    Davies, Judson D.
    Aghazadeh, Monty A.
    Phillips, Sharon
    Salem, Shady
    Chang, Sam S.
    Clark, Peter E.
    Cookson, Michael S.
    Davis, Rodney
    Herrell, S. Duke
    Penson, David F.
    Smith, Joseph A., Jr.
    Barocas, Daniel A.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 186 (06) : 2221 - 2227
  • [5] Prostate Health Index (phi) and its derivatives predict Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy among patients with low-risk prostate cancer
    Yan, Jia-Qi
    Huang, Da
    Huang, Jing-Yi
    Ruan, Xiao-Hao
    Lin, Xiao-Ling
    Fang, Zu-Jun
    Gao, Yi
    Jiang, Hao-Wen
    Wu, Yi-Shuo
    Na, Rong
    Xu, Dan-Feng
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2022, 24 (04) : 406 - +
  • [6] A nomogram to predict the absence of clinically significant prostate cancer in males with negative MRI
    Kaneko, Masatomo
    Fujihara, Atsuko
    Iwata, Tsuyoshi
    Ramacciotti, Lorenzo Storino
    Palmer, Suzanne L.
    Oishi, Masakatsu
    Aron, Manju
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Duddalwar, Vinay
    Horiguchi, Go
    Teramukai, Satoshi
    Ukimura, Osamu
    Gill, Inderbir S.
    Abreu, Andre Luis
    INTERNATIONAL BRAZ J UROL, 2024, 50 (03): : 319 - 334
  • [7] Validation of partin tables and development of a preoperative nomogram for Japanese patients with clinically localized prostate cancer using 2005 international society of urological pathology consensus on gleason grading: Data from the clinicopathological research group for localized prostate cancer
    Naito, Seiji
    Kuroiwa, Kentaro
    Kinukawa, Naoko
    Goto, Ken
    Koga, Hirofumi
    Ogawa, Osamu
    Murai, Masaru
    Shiraishi, Taizo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2008, 180 (03) : 904 - 909
  • [8] Minimal Impact of Clinical Stage on Prostate Cancer Prognosis Among Contemporary Patients With Clinically Localized Disease
    Reese, Adam C.
    Cooperberg, Matthew R.
    Carroll, Peter R.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 184 (01) : 114 - 119
  • [9] Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer
    Yang, David D.
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    Nezolosky, Michelle D.
    Vastola, Marie E.
    Labe, Shelby A.
    Boldbaatar, Ninjin
    King, Martin T.
    Martin, Neil E.
    Orio, Peter F., III
    Beard, Clair J.
    Hoffman, Karen E.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2019, 5 (01): : 69 - 76
  • [10] Does extent of prostate-specific antigen fluctuation can predict Gleason score upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients?
    Hamidi, Nurullah
    Atmaca, Ali Fuat
    Canda, Abdullah Erdem
    Keske, Murat
    Ardicoglu, Arslan
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 45 : 42 - 48