An enhanced ordered weighted averaging operators generation algorithm with applications for multicriteria decision making

被引:61
|
作者
Chen, Zhen-Song [1 ]
Yu, Cheng [2 ]
Chin, Kwai-Sang [3 ]
Martinez, Luis [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Wuhan 430072, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Northwestern Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
[3] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Syst Engn & Engn Management, Kowloon Tong, 83 Tat Chee Ave, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Jaen, Dept Comp Sci, Jaen 23071, Spain
[5] Wuhan Univ Technol, Sch Management, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Decision analysis; Probability density function; Interweaving method; Ordered weighted averaging operator; Adjustment matrix; MINIMAX DISPARITY; WATER-QUALITY; OWA OPERATORS; AGGREGATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.apm.2019.02.042
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In the present paper, we demonstrate that the degree of orness, which measures the attitudes of decision-makers, does not decrease strictly with the fractile values when either the normal probability density function or its inverse form is used to generate the weights of ordered weighted averaging operators. As for the weights of ordered weighted averaging operators generated from either the exponential distribution and its inverse form, we prove the strict monotonicity of the orness function with respect to the distribution shape parameter. To solve the drawbacks of the probability-density-function-based weight generation approach, the present paper uses the interweaving method to adjust the probabilitydensity-function-based weighting vector of an ordered weighted averaging operator based on the premise that the distribution shape parameter is excluded. This enhanced approach retains the preferences of decision-makers to the utmost when they change their attitudes toward objects. Finally, the feasibility and effectiveness of this novel paradigm for generating the weights of ordered weighted averaging operators are demonstrated with its promising application in a system for aggregating movie ratings. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 490
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators A Short Review
    Csiszar, Orsolya
    IEEE SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS MAGAZINE, 2021, 7 (02): : 4 - 12
  • [32] Ranking of alternatives with ordered weighted averaging operators
    Lamata, MT
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2004, 19 (05) : 473 - 482
  • [33] Canonical form of ordered weighted averaging operators
    Jin, LeSheng
    Mesiar, Radko
    Kalina, Martin
    Yager, Ronald R.
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 295 (02) : 605 - 631
  • [34] Similarity classifier with ordered weighted averaging operators
    Luukka, Pasi
    Kurama, Onesfole
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (04) : 995 - 1002
  • [35] Generalized Multiple Averaging Operators and their Applications to Group Decision Making
    Ligang Zhou
    Huayou Chen
    Jinpei Liu
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2013, 22 : 331 - 358
  • [36] Generalized Multiple Averaging Operators and their Applications to Group Decision Making
    Zhou, Ligang
    Chen, Huayou
    Liu, Jinpei
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2013, 22 (02) : 331 - 358
  • [37] Some hybrid weighted aggregation operators under neutrosophic set environment and their applications to multicriteria decision-making
    Harish Garg
    Applied Intelligence, 2018, 48 : 4871 - 4888
  • [38] Some hybrid weighted aggregation operators under neutrosophic set environment and their applications to multicriteria decision-making
    Garg, Harish
    Nancy
    APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 48 (12) : 4871 - 4888
  • [39] Fuzzy group decision-making based on variable weighted averaging operators
    Li, Deqing
    Zeng, Wenyi
    Li, Junhong
    2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE), 2014, : 1416 - 1421
  • [40] Generalized Ordered Weighted Reference Dependent Utility Aggregation Operators and Their Applications to Group Decision-Making
    Jianwei Gao
    Huihui Liu
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2017, 26 : 1173 - 1207