Validation of new TRUS biopsy techniques for PI-RADS 4 or 5

被引:5
作者
An, Taein [1 ]
Park, Byung Kwan [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Sch Med, 81 Irwon Ro, Seoul 06351, South Korea
来源
PRECISION AND FUTURE MEDICINE | 2020年 / 4卷 / 04期
关键词
Biopsy; Prostate; Ultrasonography; PROSTATE-CANCER; VERSION; 2; GUIDED BIOPSY; ULTRASOUND; COMPLICATIONS; RISK;
D O I
10.23838/pfm.2020.00114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recently, new magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) techniques and imaging features of Prostate Imaging and Report and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5 have been reported. The aim of this study was to validate the outcomes of new TRUS-guided biopsy techniques for cancer detection in patients with PI-RADS 4 or 5. Methods: Between June 2018 and November 2018, 94 men underwent TRUS-guided biopsy after PI-RADS 4 (n = 59) or 5 (n = 35) was categorized as an index lesion on MRI. For PI-RADS 4 group, target biopsy was performed in 5 and combination biopsy (target and systematic biopsies) was in 54. For PI-RADS 5 group, target biopsy was performed in 19 and combination biopsy was in 16. Target to combination biopsy ratios and significant cancer detection rates (CDRs) were compared between the groups. Significant cancer was defined as a Gleason score >= 7 tumor. Standard reference was biopsy examination. Fisher's exact were used for statistical analysis. Results: Target to combination biopsy ratios was 5:54 in the PI-RADS 4 group and 19:16 in the PI-RADS 5 group (P<0.0001). The significant CDR of the target biopsy were 42.4% (25/59) in the PI-RADS 4 group and 82.6% (29/35) in the PI-RADS 5 group (P=0.0002). The significant CDR of combination biopsy was 44.1% (26/59) in the PI-RADS 4 group and 85.7% (30/35) in the PI-RADS 5 group (P<0.0001). Conclusion: New TRUS biopsy techniques provides high significant CDR patients with PI-RADS 4 or 5. Therefore, TRUS should be performed prior to fusion or in-bore biopsy to determine if these categories are visible.
引用
收藏
页码:141 / 148
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Multifocal prostate cancer: biologic, prognostic, and therapeutic implications [J].
Andreoiu, Matei ;
Cheng, Liang .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 41 (06) :781-793
[2]   Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use [J].
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Verma, Sadhna ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Padhani, Anwar R. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Choyke, Peter L. .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :41-49
[3]   The detection of significant prostate cancer is correlated with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) in MRI/transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy [J].
Cash, Hannes ;
Maxeiner, Andreas ;
Stephan, Carsten ;
Fischer, Thomas ;
Durmus, Tahir ;
Holzmann, Josephine ;
Asbach, Patrick ;
Haas, Matthias ;
Hinz, Stefan ;
Neymeyer, Joerg ;
Miller, Kurt ;
Guenzel, Karsten ;
Kempkensteffen, Carsten .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (04) :525-532
[4]  
Djavan B, 1999, Tech Urol, V5, P139
[5]   UNUSUAL HYPERECHOIC APPEARANCE OF PROSTATE-CANCER ON TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY [J].
EGAWA, S ;
WHEELER, TM ;
GREENE, DR ;
SCARDINO, PT .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 69 (02) :169-174
[6]   Comparison of conventional transrectal ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, and micro-ultrasound for visualizing prostate cancer in an active surveillance population: A feasibility study [J].
Eure, Gregg ;
Fanney, Daryl ;
Lin, Jefferson ;
Wodlinger, Brian ;
Ghai, Sangeet .
CUAJ-CANADIAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL, 2019, 13 (03) :E70-E77
[7]   Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk Identification [J].
Ghai, Sangeet ;
Eure, Gregg ;
Fradet, Vincent ;
Hyndman, Matthew E. ;
McGrath, Theresa ;
Wodlinger, Brian ;
Pavlovich, Christian P. .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 196 (02) :562-568
[8]   Validation of the Dominant Sequence Paradigm and Role of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced Imaging in PI-RADS Version 2 [J].
Greer, Matthew D. ;
Shih, Joanna H. ;
Lay, Nathan ;
Barrett, Tristan ;
Bittencourt, Leonardo Kayat ;
Borofsky, Samuel ;
Kabakus, Ismail M. ;
Law, Yan Mee ;
Marko, Jamie ;
Shebel, Haytham ;
Mertan, Francesca V. ;
Merino, Maria J. ;
Wood, Bradford J. ;
Pinto, Peter A. ;
Summers, Ronald M. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Turkbey, Baris .
RADIOLOGY, 2017, 285 (03) :859-869
[9]   Validation of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer [J].
Hofbauer, Sebastian L. ;
Maxeiner, Andreas ;
Kittner, Beatrice ;
Heckmann, Robin ;
Reimann, Maximillian ;
Wiemer, Laura ;
Asbach, Patrick ;
Haas, Matthias ;
Penzkofer, Tobias ;
Stephan, Carsten ;
Friedersdorff, Frank ;
Fuller, Florian ;
Miller, Kurt ;
Cash, Hannes .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (04) :767-772
[10]   MRI-Targeted or Standard Biopsy for Prostate-Cancer Diagnosis [J].
Kasivisvanathan, V ;
Rannikko, A. S. ;
Borghi, M. ;
Panebianco, V ;
Mynderse, L. A. ;
Vaarala, M. H. ;
Briganti, A. ;
Budaus, L. ;
Hellawell, G. ;
Hindley, R. G. ;
Roobol, M. J. ;
Eggener, S. ;
Ghei, M. ;
Villers, A. ;
Bladou, F. ;
Villeirs, G. M. ;
Virdi, J. ;
Boxler, S. ;
Robert, G. ;
Singh, P. B. ;
Venderink, W. ;
Hadaschik, B. A. ;
Ruffion, A. ;
Hu, J. C. ;
Margolis, D. ;
Crouzet, S. ;
Klotz, L. ;
Taneja, S. S. ;
Pinto, P. ;
Gill, I ;
Allen, C. ;
Giganti, F. ;
Freeman, A. ;
Morris, S. ;
Punwani, S. ;
Williams, N. R. ;
Brew-Graves, C. ;
Deeks, J. ;
Takwoingi, Y. ;
Emberton, M. ;
Moore, C. M. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2018, 378 (19) :1767-1777