Low settings of the ventricular pacing output in patients dependent on a really safe?

被引:4
作者
Schuchert, A
Frese, J
Stammwitz, E
Novák, M
Schleich, A
Wagner, SM
Meinertz, T
机构
[1] Univ Hamburg, Hosp Eppendorf, Dept Cardiol, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany
[2] Hosp Pinneberg, Pinneberg, Czech Republic
[3] Hosp Leer, Leer, Czech Republic
[4] St Ann Hosp, Brno, Czech Republic
[5] Hosp Mindelheim, Mindelheim, Germany
[6] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Dept Biomed Engn, D-8520 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1067/mhj.2002.123141
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background It is generally acknowledged that pacemaker output must be adjusted with a 100% voltage safety margin above the pacing threshold to avoid ineffective pacing, especially in patients dependent on pacemakers. Aims The aim of this prospective crossover study was to assess the beat-to-beat safety of low outputs in patients who are dependent on a pacemaker between 2 follow-up examinations. Methods The study included 12 patients who had received a DDD pacemaker with an automatic beat-to-beat capture verification function. The ventricular output at 0.4 milliseconds pulse duration was programmed independently of the actual pacing threshold in a crossover randomization to 1.0 V, 1.5 V, and 2.5 V for 6 weeks each. At each follow-up, the diagnostic counters were interrogated and the pacing threshold at 0.4 milliseconds was determined in 0.1-V steps. The diagnostic pacemaker counters depict the frequency of back-up pulses delivered because of a loss of capture. During the randomization to 1.0-V output, we evaluated whether the adjustment of the output under consideration of the >100% voltage safety margin reduced the frequency of back-up pulses. Results Pacing thresholds at the randomization to 1.0-V, 1.5-V, and 2.5-V output were not significantly different, with 0.7 +/- 0.3 V at 2.5-V output, 0.6 +/- 0.2 V at 1.5-V output, and 0.6 +/- 0.2 V at 1.0-V output. The frequency of back-up pulses was similar at 2.5-V and 1.5-V output, 2.2% +/- 1.9% and 2.0% +/- 2.0%, respectively. The frequency of back-up pulses significantly increased at 1.0-V output to 5.8% +/- 6.4% (P < .05). Back-up pulses >5% of the time between the 2 follow-ups were observed in no patient at 2.5 V, in I patient at 1.5 V, and in 5 patients at 1.0 V. At the randomization to the 1.0-V output, 6 patients had pacing thresholds of 0.5 V or less, and 6 patients had pacing thresholds >0.5 V. The frequency of back-up pulses in the 2 groups was not significantly different, 6.4% +/- 8.6% and 5.7% +/- 2.6%. Conclusions The frequency of back-up pulses was significantly higher at 1.0-V output than at 1.5-V and 2.5-V output. This also applied to patients with pacing thresholds of less than or equal to0.5 V. Fixed low outputs seem not to be absolutely safe between 2 follow-ups in patients who are dependent on a pacemaker, even when the output has a 100% voltage safety margin above the pacing threshold. When patients with pacemakers programmed to a low ventricular output have symptoms of ineffective pacing, an intermittent increase of the pacing threshold should be carefully ruled out.
引用
收藏
页码:1009 / 1011
页数:3
相关论文
共 4 条
[1]   Pacemaker miniaturization: A good trend? [J].
Cazeau, S ;
Ritter, P ;
Lazarus, A ;
Duconge, R ;
Henry, L ;
Podeur, H ;
Lazarus, B ;
Mugica, J .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1996, 19 (01) :1-3
[2]   Chronic ventricular pacing using an output amplitude of 1.0 volt [J].
Schwaab, B ;
Schwerdt, H ;
Heisel, A ;
Frohlig, G ;
Schieffer, H .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 20 (09) :2171-2178
[3]   THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF CHRONIC VENTRICULAR PACING AT 1.6 VOLTS USING A STEROID ELUTING LEAD [J].
STAMATO, NJ ;
OTOOLE, MF ;
FETTER, JG ;
ENGER, EL .
PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 15 (03) :248-251
[4]  
Stokes K, 1985, MODERN CARDIAC PACIN, P33