Online dispute resolution in mediating EHR disputes: a case study on the impact of emotional intelligence

被引:4
作者
Bellucci, Emilia [1 ]
Venkatraman, Sitalakshmi [2 ]
Stranieri, Andrew [3 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Deakin Business Sch, Dept Informat Syst & Business Analyt, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[2] Melbourne Polytech, Dept Informat Technol, Prahran, Vic, Australia
[3] Federat Univ, Sch Sci Engn & Informat Technol, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
关键词
Online dispute resolution; electronic health record; mediation; emotional intelligence; negotiation support; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; NEGOTIATION; IMPLEMENTATION; SUPPORT; SYSTEMS; SAFETY; TOOL; ADR;
D O I
10.1080/0144929X.2019.1645209
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
An Electronic Health Record (EHR) is an individual's record of all health events that enables critical information to be documented and shared electronically amongst health care providers and patients. The introduction of an EHR, particularly a patient-accessible EHR, can be expected to lead to an escalation of enquiries, complaints and ultimately, disputes. Prevailing opinion is that Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) systems can help with the mediation of certain types of disputes electronically, particularly systems which deploy Artificial Intelligence (AI) to reduce the need for a human mediator. However, disputes regarding health tend to invoke emotional responses from patients that may conceivably impact ODR efficacy. This raises an interesting question on the influence of emotional intelligence (EI) in the process of mediation. Using a phenomenological research methodology simulating doctor-patient disputes mediated with an AI Smart ODR system in place of a human mediator, we found an association between EI and the propensity for a participant to change their previously asserted claims. Our results indicate participants with lower EI tend to prolong resolution compared to those with higher EI. Future research include trialling larger scale ODR systems for specific cohorts of patients in the area of health related dispute resolution are advanced.
引用
收藏
页码:1124 / 1139
页数:16
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Abdelrahman W., 2017, BMJ, V2017, DOI DOI 10.1136/BMJ.J452
[2]   Incorporating Fairness into Development of an Integrated Multi-agent Online Dispute Resolution Environment [J].
Abrahams, Brooke ;
Bellucci, Emilia ;
Zeleznikow, John .
GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2012, 21 (01) :3-28
[3]  
ALEXANDER N, 2006, HAMLINE J PUBLIC LAW, V27, P243
[4]  
Ambavale R., 2014, International Journal of Advanced Research in Management and Social Sciences, V5, P35
[5]   Medical dispute resolution, patient safety and the doctor-patient relationship [J].
Amirthalingam, Kumaralingam .
SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 58 (12) :681-684
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Alternative Dispute Resolution
[7]   Personal health records: a scoping review [J].
Archer, N. ;
Fevrier-Thomas, U. ;
Lokker, C. ;
McKibbon, K. A. ;
Straus, S. E. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2011, 18 (04) :515-522
[8]   Patient access to health records: striving for the Swedish ideal [J].
Armstrong, Stephen .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 357 :j2069
[9]  
Bar-On Reuven., 2000, HDB EMOTIONAL INTELL, P363
[10]  
BARENDRECHT M, 2016, TREND REPORT 4 ODR C, P56