Laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension: A minimally invasive technique for treating pelvic organ prolapse

被引:29
作者
Medina, Carlos
Takacs, Peter
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Obstet, Miami, FL 33152 USA
[2] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Gynecol, Miami, FL 33152 USA
关键词
myomas; menorrhagia; endometrial ablation; NovaSure;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2006.04.009
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the surgical outcomes of laparoscopic uterosacral uterine suspension and describe the surgical technique. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review (Canadian Task Force classification II-3). SETTING: University tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Twenty-three patients with symptomatic uterine prolapse and desire for uterine preservation who underwent surgical repair. INTERVENTION: Laparoscopic uterine uterosacral uterine suspension. MEASUREMENTS: Preoperative and postoperative evaluations were completed. The stage of pelvic organ prolapse was assessed using the ICS pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Descriptive statistics and paired t testing were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Nineteen of 23 patients (82.6%) had preoperative prolapse stage 2 or greater. Nine patients (40.9%) had uterine prolapse beyond the hymen. After operation there were significant improvements in the stage of prolapse (2 vs 0, p < .01). The POP-Q scores for point C and D were significantly further away from the hymen after operation than compared with the preoperative values (-0.6 vs -7.8, and -5.0 vs -8.6; p < .01) respectively. There were no intratoperative complications. The estimated blood loss (mean +/- SD) was 111.5 +/- 139.4 mL. The hospital stay (mean +/- SD) was 2.2 +/- 1.7 days. None of the patients had symptomatic prolapse during the mean follow-up of 15.9 months. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic uterine suspension appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for uterine prolapse in patients who desire uterine preservation. (C) 2006 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:472 / 475
页数:4
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
ARTHURE HGE, 1957, J OBSTET GYNAECOL, V64, P355
[2]   Abdominal sacrohysteropexy in young women with uterovaginal prolapse: Long-term follow-up [J].
Barranger, E ;
Fritel, X ;
Pigne, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (05) :1245-1250
[3]   Uterosacral ligament: Description of anatomic relationships to optimize surgical safety [J].
Buller, JL ;
Thompson, JR ;
Cundiff, GW ;
Sullivan, LK ;
Ybarra, MAS ;
Bent, AE .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 97 (06) :873-879
[4]  
Bulletti, 1996, J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc, V3, pS5
[5]   Laparoscopic uterosacral ligament uterine suspension compared with vaginal hysterectomy with vaginal vault suspension for uterovaginal prolapse [J].
Diwan, A ;
Rardin, CR ;
Strohsnitter, WC ;
Weld, A ;
Rosenblatt, P ;
Kohli, N .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2006, 17 (01) :79-83
[6]   Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review [J].
Diwan, A ;
Rardin, CR ;
Kohli, N .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2004, 15 (04) :286-292
[7]   CLINICAL AND FINANCIAL ANALYSES OF LAPAROSCOPICALLY ASSISTED VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY VERSUS ABDOMINAL HYSTERECTOMY [J].
HIDLEBAUGH, D ;
OMARA, P ;
CONBOY, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 1994, 1 (04) :357-361
[8]   Uterine problems discovered after presumed hysterectomy: The Manchester operation revisited [J].
Hopkins, MP ;
Devine, JB ;
DeLancey, JOL .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 89 (05) :846-848
[9]  
KRAUSE HG, 2005, INT UROGYNECOL J PEL, P1
[10]   Review of laparoscopic uterine suspension procedures for uterine preservation [J].
Lin, LL ;
Ho, MH ;
Haessler, AL ;
Betson, LH ;
Alinsod, RM ;
Liu, CY ;
Bhatia, NN .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 17 (05) :541-546