Economic valuation of ecosystem services fails to capture biodiversity value of tropical forests

被引:43
作者
Carrasco, L. R. [1 ]
Nghiem, T. P. L. [1 ]
Sunderland, T. [2 ]
Koh, L. P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Biol Sci, Singapore 117543, Singapore
[2] Ctr Int Forestry Res, Bogor 16000, Indonesia
[3] Univ Adelaide, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Environm Inst, Adelaide, SA, Australia
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Cultural services; Forest economics; Landscape conservation planning; Non-timber forest products; Regulating services; BENEFIT TRANSFER; GLOBAL PATTERNS; CONSERVATION; METAANALYSIS; CLIMATE; NEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.biocon.2014.08.007
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The reconciliation of biodiversity conservation, ecosystem service provision and agricultural production in tropical landscapes requires recognition of the trade-offs between competing land-uses. It is especially relevant for conservation planning to assess whether the economic value of ecosystem services is spatially congruent with biodiversity. Previous analyses have largely focused on ecosystem service provision or assumed homogeneous economic values across land uses within biomes. We relax this assumption by carrying out a spatially explicit meta-analysis based on 30 studies of ecosystem service values in tropical forests from The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB) database, while controlling for economic, environmental and methodological variables. Our results demonstrate a lack of spatial congruence between the economic value of ecosystem services and biodiversity in tropical forests. Instead, we find that economic value presents a nonlinear inverted-U relationship with site accessibility and economic activity, highlighting the importance of matching supply and demand between each ecosystem service and its beneficiaries for economic values to be realized. The implications are that conservation policies focusing solely on the economic value of ecosystem services will fail to protect biodiversity in remote and less disturbed regions. (C) 2014 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:163 / 170
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
Angelsen A., 2014, World Development
[2]  
Angelsen A., 2003, Center for International Forestry Research: CIFOR Occasional Paper, V40, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, SYNTHESIS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[5]  
[Anonymous], THE TEEB VALUATION D
[6]   Ecology - Economic reasons for conserving wild nature [J].
Balmford, A ;
Bruner, A ;
Cooper, P ;
Costanza, R ;
Farber, S ;
Green, RE ;
Jenkins, M ;
Jefferiss, P ;
Jessamy, V ;
Madden, J ;
Munro, K ;
Myers, N ;
Naeem, S ;
Paavola, J ;
Rayment, M ;
Rosendo, S ;
Roughgarden, J ;
Trumper, K ;
Turner, RK .
SCIENCE, 2002, 297 (5583) :950-953
[7]   Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services [J].
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Pfisterer, Andrea B. ;
Buchmann, Nina ;
He, Jing-Shen ;
Nakashizuka, Tohru ;
Raffaelli, David ;
Schmid, Bernhard .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2006, 9 (10) :1146-1156
[8]   GLC2000:: a new approach to global land cover mapping from Earth observation data [J].
Bartholomé, E ;
Belward, AS .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (09) :1959-1977
[9]   Contrasting conventional with multi-level modeling approaches to meta-analysis: Expectation consistency in UK woodland recreation values [J].
Bateman, IJ ;
Jones, AP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2003, 79 (02) :235-258
[10]   What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units [J].
Boyd, James ;
Banzhaf, Spencer .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2007, 63 (2-3) :616-626