An Examination of Positive Impression Management Validity Scales in the Context of Parenting Capacity Assessments

被引:5
作者
Harper, Julie M. [1 ]
Schmidt, Fred [1 ,2 ]
Cuttress, L. Jane [2 ]
Mazmanian, Dwight [1 ]
机构
[1] Lakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
[2] Childrens Ctr Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
关键词
parenting capacity; PAI; validity; PIM; impression management; PERSONALITY-ASSESSMENT INVENTORY; CHILD-CUSTODY EVALUATIONS; MCMI-III; MMPI-2; MALTREATMENT; PROFILES; DISORDER; RATES; PAI;
D O I
10.1080/15228932.2014.890482
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Although professionals conducting parenting capacity assessments (PCAs) frequently rely on test validity scales to measure parental efforts at social desirability, very limited data is available on their performance. The current study found strong concurrent validity between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) validity scales. Results were also consistent with previous studies that suggest parents engage in some level of impression management. However, the PAI appeared to identify far fewer parents as engaging in positive impression management when compared to the MCMI-III or what has been published in previous studies on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Future directions and recommendations regarding the use of validity scales in PCAs are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 126
页数:25
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   CHILD CUSTODY EVALUATION PRACTICES: A 20-YEAR FOLLOW-UP [J].
Ackerman, Marc J. ;
Pritzl, Tracy Brey .
FAMILY COURT REVIEW, 2011, 49 (03) :618-628
[2]   Custody evaluation practices: A survey of experienced professionals (Revisited) [J].
Ackerman, MJ ;
Ackerman, MC .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1997, 28 (02) :137-145
[3]   MMPI-2-RF Characteristics of Custody Evaluation Litigants [J].
Archer, Elizabeth M. ;
Hagan, Leigh D. ;
Mason, Janelle ;
Handel, Richard ;
Archer, Robert P. .
ASSESSMENT, 2012, 19 (01) :14-20
[4]   Defensive responding on the MMPI-2 in family custody and access evaluations [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Nicholson, RA ;
Buis, T ;
Radovanovic, H ;
Fidler, BJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1999, 11 (01) :24-28
[5]   Normative data for the MMPI-2 in child custody litigation [J].
Bathurst, K ;
Gottfried, AW ;
Gottfried, AE .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 1997, 9 (03) :205-211
[6]  
Bavolek S. J., 2001, ADULT ADOLESCENT PAR
[7]   The use of the MCMI-III in completing parenting capacity assessments [J].
Blood, Lowell .
JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY PRACTICE, 2008, 8 (01) :24-38
[8]   Validity rates of the Personality Assessment Inventory and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 in a VA medical center setting [J].
Braxton, Loretta E. ;
Calhoun, Patrick S. ;
Williams, John E. ;
Boggs, Christina D. .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2007, 88 (01) :5-15
[9]   Clinical assessment of parents in child protection cases: An empirical analysis [J].
Budd, KS ;
Poindexter, LM ;
Felix, ED ;
Naik-Polan, AT .
LAW AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2001, 25 (01) :93-108
[10]   Evaluating parenting capacity: Validity problems with the MMPI-2, PAI, CAPI, and ratings of child adjustment [J].
Carr, GD ;
Moretti, MM ;
Cue, BJH .
PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2005, 36 (02) :188-196