An Examination of Positive Impression Management Validity Scales in the Context of Parenting Capacity Assessments
被引:5
作者:
Harper, Julie M.
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Lakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, CanadaLakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Harper, Julie M.
[1
]
Schmidt, Fred
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Lakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Childrens Ctr Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay, ON, CanadaLakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Schmidt, Fred
[1
,2
]
Cuttress, L. Jane
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Childrens Ctr Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay, ON, CanadaLakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Cuttress, L. Jane
[2
]
Mazmanian, Dwight
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Lakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, CanadaLakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
Mazmanian, Dwight
[1
]
机构:
[1] Lakehead Univ, Dept Psychol, Thunder Bay, ON P7B 5E1, Canada
[2] Childrens Ctr Thunder Bay, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
Although professionals conducting parenting capacity assessments (PCAs) frequently rely on test validity scales to measure parental efforts at social desirability, very limited data is available on their performance. The current study found strong concurrent validity between the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) and Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III (MCMI-III) validity scales. Results were also consistent with previous studies that suggest parents engage in some level of impression management. However, the PAI appeared to identify far fewer parents as engaging in positive impression management when compared to the MCMI-III or what has been published in previous studies on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2). Future directions and recommendations regarding the use of validity scales in PCAs are provided.