Autonomy or Control? Organizational Architecture and Corporate Attention to Stakeholders

被引:52
作者
Crilly, Donal [1 ]
Sloan, Pamela [2 ]
机构
[1] London Business Sch, London NW1 4SA, England
[2] HEC Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3T 2A7, Canada
关键词
organizational attention; organizational architecture; TMT frames; middle managers; stakeholder theory; TOP MANAGEMENT TEAM; MIDDLE MANAGERS; STRATEGIC ACTION; COGNITION; DESIGN; RETHINKING; CEO; RESPONSIBILITY; CAPABILITIES; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1287/orsc.2013.0849
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Existing explanations of corporate attention to stakeholders overlook how organizations distribute the attention of their members. Combining interview and survey data at two levels of analysis, we show that executives' assumptions about how best to configure their organizations have important implications for how their firms attend to stakeholders. We identify two types of organizational architecture: guided autonomy and cascaded control. The former enables specialized attention at the level of the individual manager and facilitates simultaneous attention to a large number of stakeholders; the latter restricts the autonomy of individual managers and leads to redundancy in attention. Our contribution is a framework that takes account of top manager frames and organizational architecture to articulate the relationship between individual- and organizational-level attention and to explain why some firms can address the concerns of multiple stakeholders simultaneously.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 355
页数:17
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   SHAREHOLDERS AND STAKEHOLDERS: HOW DO DIRECTORS DECIDE? [J].
Adams, Renee B. ;
Licht, Amir N. ;
Sagiv, Lilach .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2011, 32 (12) :1331-1355
[2]   Spillovers across organizational architectures: The role of prior resource allocation and communication in post-acquisition coordination outcomes [J].
Agarwal, Rajshree ;
Anand, Jaideep ;
Bercovitz, Janet ;
Croson, Rachel .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2012, 33 (06) :710-733
[3]   Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values [J].
Agle, BR ;
Mitchell, RK ;
Sonnenfeld, JA .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1999, 42 (05) :507-525
[4]   Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations [J].
Aguilera, Ruth V. ;
Rupp, Deborah E. ;
Williams, Cynthia A. ;
Ganapathi, Jyoti .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2007, 32 (03) :836-863
[5]  
Aiken LS., 1991, MULTIPLE REGRESSION
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Language War
[7]   A Behavioral Theory of the Firm -: 40 years and counting:: Introduction and impact [J].
Argote, Linda ;
Greve, Henrich R. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2007, 18 (03) :337-349
[8]   Organizational design: Decision rights and incentive contracts [J].
Athey, S ;
Roberts, J .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (02) :200-205
[9]  
Baayen R. H., 2008, ANAL LINGUISTIC DATA, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511801686, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511801686]
[10]   Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness [J].
Bansal, P ;
Roth, K .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :717-736