Characteristics of Suture Materials Used in Oral Surgery: Systematic Review

被引:17
作者
Faris, Abdullah [1 ]
Khalid, Lian [1 ]
Hashim, Mohammed [1 ]
Yaghi, Sara [1 ]
Magde, Taif [1 ]
Bouresly, Ward [1 ]
Hamdoon, Zaid [1 ]
Uthman, Asmaa T. [2 ]
Marei, Hesham [2 ]
Al-Rawi, Natheer [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sharjah, Coll Dent Med, Dept Oral & Craniofacial Hlth Sci, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
[2] Gulf Med Univ, Coll Dent, Dept Diagnost & Surg Dent Sci, Ajman, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Tissue reaction; Suture; Inflammation; Bacterial adhesion; SILK; ACID;
D O I
10.1016/j.identj.2022.02.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background: The aim of this review was to evaluate the most used suture materials with regards to their inflammatory response, their bacterial adhesion, and their physical properties when used to close oral wounds. Methods: Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Dentistry & Oral Sciences, and OVID) were searched to retrieve relevant studies from January 1, 2000, to January 31, 2020. Results: Out of the 269 articles, only 13 studies were selected as they were relevant and met the systematic review's protocol. These studies showed that almost all suture materials studies (catgut, polyglycolic acid [PGA] sutures, nylon, expanded polytetrafluoroethylene, and silk sutures) caused bacterial adherence and tissue reaction. In nylon and chromic catgut, the number of bacteria accumulated was lowest. Silk and nylon were found to be more impacted than catgut and PGA in terms of physical characteristics such as tensile strength. PGA, on the other hand, was said to be the most susceptible to knot unwinding. Conclusions: Following an oral surgical operation, all sutures revealed varied degrees of irritation and microbial accumulation. Nonresorbable monofilament synthetic sutures, however, exhibited less tissue response and less microbial accumulation. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of FDI World Dental Federation.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 287
页数:10
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Physical and Mechanical Evaluation of Five Suture Materials on Three Knot Configurations: An in Vitro Study [J].
Abellan, Desire ;
Nart, Jose ;
Pascual, Andres ;
Cohen, Robert E. ;
Sanz-Moliner, Javier D. .
POLYMERS, 2016, 8 (04)
[2]   Tensile Strength of Novel Nonabsorbable PTFE (Teflon®) versus Other Suture Materials: An In Vitro Study [J].
Arce, Jose ;
Palacios, Alondra ;
Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel ;
Mendoza-Azpur, G. ;
Romero-Tapia, Percy ;
Mayta-Tovalino, Frank .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2019, 2019
[3]   Microbial accumulation on different suture materials following oral surgery: a randomized controlled study [J].
Asher, Ran ;
Chacartchi, Tali ;
Tandlich, Moshik ;
Shapira, Lior ;
Polak, David .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2019, 23 (02) :559-565
[4]  
Balamurugan R, 2012, J Contemp Dent Pract, V13, P521
[5]  
Javed Fawad, 2012, ISRN Dent, V2012, P762095, DOI 10.5402/2012/762095
[6]  
Kakoei Shahla, 2010, Iran Endod J, V5, P69
[7]  
Khalafallah A, 2010, MEDITERR J HEMATOL I, V2, DOI [10.4084/MJHID.2010.005, 10.1136/bmj.l4898]
[8]   Comparison of tensile and knot security properties of surgical sutures [J].
Kim, Jin-Cheol ;
Lee, Yong-Keun ;
Lim, Bum-Soon ;
Rhee, Sang-Hoon ;
Yang, Hyeong-Cheol .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 18 (12) :2363-2369
[9]  
Kumar M Suresh, 2013, J Int Oral Health, V5, P95
[10]   Human gingival tissue reactions to silk and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures [J].
Leknes, KN ;
Roynstrand, IT ;
Selvig, KA .
JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2005, 76 (01) :34-42