Effects of interleaved and blocked study on delayed test of category learning generalization

被引:42
作者
Carvalho, Paulo F. [1 ]
Goldstone, Robert L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2014年 / 5卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
category learning; interleaving; blocking; spacing; comparison; DISTRIBUTED PRACTICE; RECOGNITION MEMORY; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE; RETENTION; INDUCTION; CATEGORIZATION; RECALL; ORDER; SKILL; REPETITIONS;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00936
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Studying different concepts by frequently alternating between them (i.e., interleaving), improves discriminative contrast between different categories, while studying each concept in separate blocks emphasizes the similarities within each category. Interleaved study has been shown to improve learning of high similarity categories by increasing between-category comparison, while blocked study improves learning of low similarity categories by increasing within-category comparison. In addition, interleaved study presents greater temporal spacing between repetitions of each category compared to blocked study, which might present long-term memory benefits. In this study we asked if the benefits of temporal spacing would interact with the benefits of sequencing for making comparisons when testing was delayed, particularly for low similarity categories. Blocked study might be predicted to promote noticing similarities across members of the same category and result in short-term benefits. However, the increase in temporal delay between repetitions inherent to interleaved study might benefit both types of categories when tested after a longer retention interval. Participants studied categories either interleaved or blocked and were tested immediately and 24 h after study. We found an interaction between schedule of study and the type of category studied, which is consistent with the differential emphasis promoted by each sequential schedule. However, increasing the retention interval did not modulate this interaction or resulted in improved performance for interleaved study. Overall, this indicates that the benefit of interleaving is not primarily due to temporal spacing during study, but rather due to the cross-category comparisons that interleaving facilitates. We discuss the benefits of temporal spacing of repetitions in the context of sequential study and how it can be integrated with the attentional bias hypothesis proposed by Carvalho and Goldstone (2014a).
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 58 条
[51]   Equal spacing and expanding schedules in children's categorization and generalization [J].
Vlach, Haley A. ;
Sandhofer, Catherine M. ;
Bjork, Robert A. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 123 :129-137
[52]   At the Same Time or Apart in Time? The Role of Presentation Timing and Retrieval Dynamics in Generalization [J].
Vlach, Haley A. ;
Ankowski, Amber A. ;
Sandhofer, Catherine M. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2012, 38 (01) :246-254
[53]   The spacing effect in children's memory and category induction [J].
Vlach, Haley A. ;
Sandhofer, Catherine M. ;
Kornell, Nate .
COGNITION, 2008, 109 (01) :163-167
[54]   The Role of Reminding in the Effects of Spaced Repetitions on Cued Recall: Sufficient but Not Necessary [J].
Wahlheim, Christopher N. ;
Maddox, Geoffrey B. ;
Jacoby, Larry L. .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2014, 40 (01) :94-105
[55]   Spacing enhances the learning of natural concepts: an investigation of mechanisms, metacognition, and aging [J].
Wahlheim, Christopher N. ;
Dunlosky, John ;
Jacoby, Larry L. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2011, 39 (05) :750-763
[56]   CONCEPT-LEARNING AS A FUNCTION OF FORM OF INTERNAL STRUCTURE [J].
WHITMAN, JR ;
GARNER, WR .
JOURNAL OF VERBAL LEARNING AND VERBAL BEHAVIOR, 1963, 2 (02) :195-202
[57]   The exemplar interleaving effect in inductive learning: Moderation by the difficulty of category discriminations [J].
Zulkiply, Norehan ;
Burt, Jennifer S. .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2013, 41 (01) :16-27
[58]   Spacing and induction: Application to exemplars presented as auditory and visual text [J].
Zulkiply, Norehan ;
McLean, John ;
Burt, Jennifer S. ;
Bath, Debra .
LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2012, 22 (03) :215-221