Potentials of on-line repositioning based on implanted fiducial markers and electronic portal imaging in prostate cancer radiotherapy

被引:25
作者
Graf, Reinhold [1 ]
Wust, Peter [1 ]
Budach, Volker [1 ]
Boehmer, Dirk [1 ]
机构
[1] Charite, Dept Radiotherapy, Campus Virchow Klinikum, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
关键词
MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; SET-UP VERIFICATION; CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY; BONY ANATOMY; GOLD MARKERS; GUIDED RADIOTHERAPY; RADIOPAQUE MARKERS; MOTION; LOCALIZATION; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1186/1748-717X-4-13
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: To evaluate the benefit of an on-line correction protocol based on implanted markers and weekly portal imaging in external beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer. To compare the use of bony anatomy versus implanted markers for calculation of setup-error plus/minus prostate movement. To estimate the error reduction (and the corresponding margin reduction) by reducing the total error to 3 mm once a week, three times per week or every treatment day. Methods: 23 patients had three to five, 2.5 mm circle divide spherical gold markers transrectally inserted into the prostate before radiotherapy. Verification and correction of treatment position by analysis of orthogonal portal images was performed on a weekly basis. We registered with respect to the bony contours (setup error) and to the marker position (prostate motion) and determined the total error. The systematic and random errors are specified. Positioning correction was applied with a threshold of 5 mm displacement. Results: The systematic error (1 standard deviation [SD]) in left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI) and anterior-posterior (AP) direction contributes for the setup 1.6 mm, 2.1 mm and 2.4 mm and for prostate motion 1.1 mm, 1.9 mm and 2.3 mm. The random error (1 SD) in LR, SI and AP direction amounts for the setup 2.3 mm, 2.7 mm and 2.7 mm and for motion 1.4 mm, 2.3 mm and 2.7 mm. The resulting total error suggests margins of 7.0 mm (LR), 9.5 mm (SI) and 9.5 mm (AP) between clinical target volume (CTV) and planning target volume (PTV). After correction once a week the margins were lowered to 6.7, 8.2 and 8.7 mm and furthermore down to 4.9, 5.1 and 4.8 mm after correcting every treatment day. Conclusion: Prostate movement relative to adjacent bony anatomy is significant and contributes substantially to the target position variability. Performing on-line setup correction using implanted radioopaque markers and megavoltage radiography results in reduced treatment margins depending on the online imaging protocol (once a week or more frequently).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Performing daily prostate targeting with a standard V-EPID and an automated radio-opaque marker detection algorithm [J].
Beaulieu, L ;
Girouard, LM ;
Aubin, S ;
Aubry, JF ;
Brouard, L ;
Roy-Lacroix, L ;
Dumont, J ;
Tremblay, D ;
Laverdière, J ;
Vigneault, E .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2004, 73 (01) :61-64
[2]   Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using implanted fiducial markers with daily portal imaging: Assessment of prostate organ motion [J].
Chen, Jergin ;
Lee, R. Jeffrey ;
Handrahan, Diana ;
Sause, William T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2007, 68 (03) :912-919
[3]   On-line aSi portal imaging of implanted fiducial markers for the reduction of interfraction error during conformal radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma [J].
Chung, PWM ;
Haycocks, T ;
Brown, T ;
Cambridge, Z ;
Kelly, V ;
Alasti, H ;
Jaffray, DA ;
Catton, CN .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (01) :329-334
[4]   PROSTATE MOTION DURING STANDARD RADIOTHERAPY AS ASSESSED BY FIDUCIAL MARKERS [J].
CROOK, JM ;
RAYMOND, Y ;
SALHANI, D ;
YANG, H ;
ESCHE, B .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1995, 37 (01) :35-42
[5]   Application of the no action level (NAL) protocol to correct for prostate motion based on electronic portal imaging of implanted markers [J].
De Boer, HCJ ;
Van Os, MJH ;
Jansen, PP ;
Heumen, BJM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 61 (04) :969-983
[6]   A protocol for the reduction of systematic patient setup errors with minimal portal imaging workload [J].
De Boer, HCJ ;
Heijmen, BJM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05) :1350-1365
[7]   Increased risk of biochemical and local failure in patients with distended rectum on the planning CT for prostate cancer radiotherapy [J].
De Crevoisier, R ;
Tucker, SL ;
Dong, L ;
Mohan, R ;
Cheung, R ;
Cox, JD ;
Kuban, DA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (04) :965-973
[8]   Clinical feasibility study for the use of implanted gold seeds in the prostate as reliable positioning markers during megavoltage irradiation [J].
Dehnad, H ;
Nederveen, AJ ;
van der Heide, UA ;
van Moorselaar, RJA ;
Hofman, P ;
Lagendijk, JJW .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 67 (03) :295-302
[9]   The electronic portal imaging system Siemens Beamview Plus® versus the conventional verification films CEA-TVS® and DuPont COL-7® -: A critical appraisal of visual image quality [J].
Gagel, B ;
Schramm, O ;
Harms, W ;
Mulhern, A ;
Wenz, F ;
van Kampen, M ;
Wannenmacher, M ;
Eble, MJ .
STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2002, 178 (08) :446-452
[10]   Prostate gland motion assessed with cine-magnetic resonance imaging (cine-MRI) [J].
Ghilezan, MJ ;
Jaffray, DA ;
Siewerdsen, JH ;
van Herk, M ;
Shetty, A ;
Sharpe, MB ;
Jafri, SZ ;
Vicini, FA ;
Matter, RC ;
Brabbins, DS ;
Martinez, AA .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2005, 62 (02) :406-417