Assessment of multi-objective optimization for nondestructive evaluation of damage in structural components

被引:12
作者
Wang, Mengyu [1 ]
Brigham, John C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Multi-objective optimization; inverse characterization; nondestructive evaluation; genetic algorithm; computational inverse mechanics; GENETIC ALGORITHM; SEARCH ALGORITHM; IDENTIFICATION; MODEL; FRAMEWORK; CRACK; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1177/1045389X13494933
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
A multi-objective optimization-based computational approach to nondestructive evaluation of damage in structural components, and more generally in solid continua, is discussed and numerically evaluated. The multi-objective approach provides a substantial improvement in the capabilities to traverse the optimization search space to minimize the measurement error and produce accurate damage estimates. Through simulated test problems based on the characterization of damage in structural steel components, including internal pipe surface geometry as well as material loss within a plate structure utilizing steady-state dynamic measurements of outer surface displacement, a multi-objective genetic algorithm optimization approach is shown to provide substantial computational improvement over single-objective strategies. The multi-objective approach consistently and efficiently produces more accurate characterization results in contrast to equivalent single-objective strategies. More importantly, the multi-objective approach is shown to exhibit consistently better tolerance to test measurement noise and measurement sparsity. Moreover, the multi-objective strategy was found to provide improved diversity in the solution estimates for ill-posed problems, which is an important step leading to insight into the necessary changes to the testing or parameterization to subsequently produce more accurate and unique solutions to such inverse characterization problems.
引用
收藏
页码:1082 / 1096
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Multi-objective optimization of geometric dimensions and material composition of functionally graded components [J].
Vel, Senthil S. ;
Goupee, Andrew J. .
MULTISCALE AND FUNCTIONALLY GRADED MATERIALS, 2008, 973 :610-615
[22]   Multi-objective optimization techniques: a survey of the state-of-the-art and applications Multi-objective optimization techniques [J].
Saini, Naveen ;
Saha, Sriparna .
EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL-SPECIAL TOPICS, 2021, 230 (10) :2319-2335
[23]   Multi-Objective Optimization of Hybrid PVT Solar Panels [J].
Ouhsiane, L. ;
Siroux, M. ;
El Ganaoui, M. ;
Mimet, A. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND UTILITY EXHIBITION ON GREEN ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (ICUE 2018), 2018,
[24]   Effective multi-objective optimization of Stirling engine systems [J].
Punnathanam, Varun ;
Kotecha, Prakash .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 108 :261-276
[25]   Evaluation of a genetic algorithm for constrained multi-objective structural optimization in laminated glass design [J].
Braghin, Andrea ;
Galuppi, Laura ;
Royer-Carfagni, Gianni .
COMPOSITE STRUCTURES, 2025, 354
[26]   Application of multi-objective optimization to structural damage estimation via model updating [J].
Shabbir, Faisal ;
Omenzetter, Piotr .
HEALTH MONITORING OF STRUCTURAL AND BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMS 2012, 2012, 8348
[27]   Logic optimality for multi-objective optimization [J].
Li, Xiang ;
Wong, Hau-San .
APPLIED MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTATION, 2009, 215 (08) :3045-3056
[28]   Multi-objective bacterial foraging optimization [J].
Niu, Ben ;
Wang, Hong ;
Wang, Jingwen ;
Tan, Lijing .
NEUROCOMPUTING, 2013, 116 :336-345
[29]   Multi-objective Cellular Automata Optimization [J].
Sidiropoulos, Epaminondas .
CELLULAR AUTOMATA, ACRI 2012, 2012, 7495 :131-140
[30]   An evolutionary constrained multi-objective optimization algorithm with parallel evaluation strategy [J].
Shimoyama, Koji ;
Kato, Taiga .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MECHANICAL DESIGN SYSTEMS AND MANUFACTURING, 2017, 11 (05)