Institutions and inequality interplay shapes the impact of economic growth on biodiversity loss

被引:7
作者
Mirza, M. Usman [1 ,2 ]
Richter, Andries [3 ,4 ]
van Nes, Egbert H. [2 ]
Scheffer, Marten [2 ]
机构
[1] Maastricht Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Maastricht, Netherlands
[2] Wageningen Univ, Environm Sci, Wageningen, Netherlands
[3] Wageningen Univ, Subdept Econ, Environm Econ & Nat Resources Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ Oslo, Ctr Ecol & Evolutionary Synth, Dept Biosci, Oslo, Norway
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
biodiversity; inequality; institutions; nonlinear relationships; socioeconomic processes; sustainability; INCOME INEQUALITY; CONSERVATION; SUSTAINABILITY; REASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY; CONSENSUS; POLITICS; QUALITY; PANEL;
D O I
10.5751/ES-12078-250439
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The latest global assessment of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) warns that biodiversity loss can make ecosystems more vulnerable to the effects of climate change and other stressors. Economic growth has been identified as one of the key drivers of these losses, however, the impact pathway may depend on how society organizes economic activity and distributes its benefits. Here we use a global country-level dataset to show how the strength of national institutions and economic inequality in society can mediate the loss of biodiversity worldwide. We find that the interplay of institutions and inequality fully mediates the impact of economic growth on plant biodiversity, but only partially mediates the impact on animal biodiversity. Furthermore, in sustaining biodiversity, the effectiveness of institutions depends on inequality in society, such that biodiversity loss is ameliorated when institutions are strong and inequality low, but in regions with high inequality, institutions tend to lose their efficacy. The analysis also uncovers nonlinearities in inequality, institutions, and biodiversity interactions, which are important to investigate further and consider for policy purposes.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Abson DJ., 2017, AMBIO, V46, P30, DOI [10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y, DOI 10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y]
[2]   Persistence of power, elites, and institutions [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Robinson, James A. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (01) :267-293
[3]   A theory of trickle-down growth and development [J].
Aghion, P ;
Bolton, P .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (02) :151-172
[4]   Inequality and economic growth: Trickle-down effect revisited [J].
Akinci, Merter .
DEVELOPMENT POLICY REVIEW, 2018, 36 :O1-O24
[5]   DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
ALESINA, A ;
RODRIK, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (02) :465-490
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, SCINCE, DOI [10.1017/s1355770x00000413, DOI 10.1017/S1355770X00000413]
[7]   Biodiversity offsetting and conservation: refraning nature to save it [J].
Apostolopoulou, Evangelia ;
Adams, William M. .
ORYX, 2017, 51 (01) :23-31
[8]   Biodiversity loss and economic growth: A cross-country analysis [J].
Asafu-Adjaye, J .
CONTEMPORARY ECONOMIC POLICY, 2003, 21 (02) :173-185
[9]   Inequality and growth: What can the data say? [J].
Banerjee, AV ;
Duflo, E .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2003, 8 (03) :267-299
[10]   Inequality and growth in a panel of countries [J].
Barro, RJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC GROWTH, 2000, 5 (01) :5-32