Using Concentrating Solar Power to Create a Geological Thermal Energy Reservoir for Seasonal Storage and Flexible Power Plant Operation

被引:15
作者
Sharan, Prashant [1 ]
Kitz, Kevin [2 ]
Wendt, Daniel [3 ]
McTigue, Joshua [1 ]
Zhu, Guangdong [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Kitzworks LLC, 5078 E Stemwood St, Boise, ID 83716 USA
[3] Idaho Natl Lab, Idaho Falls, ID 83404 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME | 2021年 / 143卷 / 01期
关键词
energy storage; geothermal; concentrating solar power; seasonal storage; renewable energy; solar thermal; alternative energy sources; energy conversion; systems; energy storage systems; energy systems analysis; LIQUID-AIR; THERMOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PARABOLIC TROUGH; HEAT-STORAGE; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; GENERATION; SYSTEMS; COST;
D O I
10.1115/1.4047970
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
We propose a hybrid renewable energy system-a geothermal energy storage system (GeoTES) with solar-to provide low-cost dispatchable power at various timescales from daily, to weekly, to seasonally. GeoTES with solar uses a concentrating solar power collector field to produce hot water that is injected into a sedimentary basin to create a synthetic geothermal resource. The stored geothermal heat can then be dispatched when required by the electrical grid. GeoTES is particularly valuable for a grid with a high penetration of non-flexible renewable technologies such as photovoltaic and wind power. In this work, a sophisticated hybrid model is developed to assess the technical and economic potential of GeoTES by combining IPSEpro, which is a power-cycle simulation tool, and SAM, an economic analysis tool by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). The analysis shows with proper initial charging period that the heat loss in storage is almost negligible and is a suitable technology for long-term energy storage. Various power-cycle options are evaluated, and the most suitable power cycle is selected for further study. Annual calculations of the GeoTES system indicate that a levelized cost of storage (LCOS) of 12.4 e/kWh(e) can be achieved for seasonal storage of 4000 h; this value is much lower than the existing long-term storage. The LCOS of GeoTES is insensitive to the storage duration above 8 h, unlike battery and molten-salt thermal storage systems. This result demonstrates that GeoTES can be a competitive seasonal storage technology in the future electricity market. The levelized cost of electricity of the GeoTES system is also carefully analyzed and can vary between 10.0 and 16.4 e/kWh(e), depending on solar-collector prices.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Augustine C., 2019, GEOVISION ANAL SUPPO, DOI 10.2172/1524768
[2]  
Burkholder F, 2009, HEAT LOSS TESTING SC, P7
[3]   Thermal energy storage for low and medium temperature applications using phase change materials - A review [J].
da Cunha, Jose Pereira ;
Eames, Philip .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 177 :227-238
[4]   Performance analysis and optimization of double-flash geothermal power plants [J].
Dagdas, Ahmet .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2007, 129 (02) :125-133
[5]   Thermodynamic analysis and optimisation of a combined liquid air and pumped thermal energy storage cycle [J].
Farres-Antunez, Pau ;
Xue, Haobai ;
White, Alexander J. .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE, 2018, 18 :90-102
[6]   A thermo-economic analysis and comparison of pumped-thermal and liquid-air electricity storage systems [J].
Georgiou, Solomos ;
Shah, Nilay ;
Markides, Christos N. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2018, 226 :1119-1133
[7]  
IPSEpro, 2016, IPSEPRO SOFTW SYST C
[8]   Comparison of electricity storage options using levelized cost of storage (LCOS) method [J].
Juelch, Verena .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 183 :1594-1606
[9]  
Julch V., 2015, P SMARTER EUR C U DU
[10]   Retrofitting a geothermal power plant to optimize performance:: A case study [J].
Kanoglu, M ;
Çengel, YA .
JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESOURCES TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1999, 121 (04) :295-301