The Effects of Combined Infill Patterns on Mechanical Properties in FDM Process

被引:75
作者
Dezaki, Mohammadreza Lalegani [1 ]
Ariffin, Mohd Khairol Anuar Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Putra Malaysia, Dept Mech & Mfg Engn, Serdang 43400, Malaysia
关键词
additive manufacturing; polylactic acid; fused deposition modeling; polymer; 3D printing; ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING PROCESS; MODELING PROCESS PARAMETERS; DEPOSITION; TENSILE; OPTIMIZATION; ACCURACY; BEHAVIOR; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/polym12122792
中图分类号
O63 [高分子化学(高聚物)];
学科分类号
070305 ; 080501 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Fused deposition modeling (FDM) is commonly used to print different products with highly complex features. Process parameters for FDM are divided into controllable or uncontrollable parameters. The most critical ones are built orientation, layer thickness, infill pattern, infill density, and nozzle diameter. This study investigates the effects of combined infill patterns in 3D printed products. Five patterns (solid, honeycomb, wiggle, grid, and rectilinear) were combined in samples to analyze their effects on mechanical properties for tensile strength analysis. Polylactic acid (PLA) samples were printed in different build orientations through two directions: flat and on-edge. The limitation was that the software and machine could not combine the infill patterns. Thus, the patterns were designed and assembled in computer aided design (CAD) software. Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to determine the patterns' features and results showed honeycomb and grid have the highest strength while their weights were lighter compared to solid. Moreover, 0 degrees samples in both flat and on-edge direction had the strongest layer adhesion and the best quality. In contrast, perpendicular samples like 60 degrees and 75 degrees showed poor adhesion and were the weakest specimens in both flat and on-edge, respectively. In brief, by increasing the build orientation, the strength decreases in this study.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 20
页数:20
相关论文
共 73 条
  • [1] Polishing of fused deposition modeling products by hot air jet: Evaluation of surface roughness
    Adel, Mohamed
    Abdelaal, Osama
    Gad, Abdelrasoul
    Nasr, Abu Balu
    Khalil, AboelMakaram
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 251 : 73 - 82
  • [2] Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS
    Ahn, SH
    Montero, M
    Odell, D
    Roundy, S
    Wright, PK
    [J]. RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) : 248 - 257
  • [3] Effect of Filling Pattern on the Tensile and Flexural Mechanical Properties of FDM 3D Printed Products
    Akhoundi, B.
    Behravesh, A. H.
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL MECHANICS, 2019, 59 (06) : 883 - 897
  • [4] Alexandru Popan, 2015, Applied Mechanics and Materials, V808, P339, DOI 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.808.339
  • [5] Alsoufi M.S., 2018, Int. J. Eng. Technol., V7, P44, DOI [10.14419/ijet.v7i1.8345, DOI 10.14419/IJET.V7I1.8345]
  • [6] 110th Anniversary: Vat Photopolymerization-Based Additive Manufacturing: Current Trends and Future Directions in Materials Design
    Appuhamillage, Gayan A.
    Chartrain, Nicholas
    Meenakshisundaram, Viswanath
    Feller, Keyton D.
    Williams, Christopher B.
    Long, Timothy E.
    [J]. INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH, 2019, 58 (33) : 15109 - 15118
  • [7] Slicer Method Comparison Using Open-source 3D Printer
    Ariffin, M. K. A. Mohd
    Sukindar, N. A.
    Baharudin, B. T. H. T.
    Jaafar, C. N. A.
    Ismail, M. I. S.
    [J]. 2017 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON POWER AND ENERGY ENGINEERING, 2018, 114
  • [8] Bi Z., 2018, FINITE ELEM ANAL DES, P1, DOI DOI 10.1016/B978-0-12-809952-0.00001-7
  • [9] Biron M., 2007, THERMOPLASTICS THERM, P155
  • [10] Environmental assessment of additive manufacturing in the automotive industry
    Bockin, Daniel
    Tillman, Anne-Marie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 226 : 977 - 987