Quantifying the rear and front long-term spectral impact on bifacial photovoltaic modules

被引:13
作者
Mouhib, Elmehdi [1 ]
Rodrigo, Pedro M. [2 ]
Micheli, Leonardo [1 ,3 ]
Fernandez, Eduardo F.
Almonacid, Florencia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jaen UJA, Adv Photovolta Technol AdPVTech, CEACTEMA, Jaen 23071, Spain
[2] Univ Panamericana, Fac Ingn, Josemaria Escr Balaguer 101, Aguascalientes 20296, Mexico
[3] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Astronaut Elect & Energy Engn DIAEE, Rome, Italy
关键词
Bifacial; Long-term analysis; Photovoltaics; SMARTS; Spectral impact; ENERGY YIELD; SOLAR SPECTRUM; AIR-MASS; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; IRRADIANCE; VALIDATION; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.solener.2022.10.035
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The demand for bifacial photovoltaic modules is continuously increasing. However, some aspects of their behaviour under realistic operating conditions still require more in-depth investigations. Indeed, the long-term analysis of the spectral impact on bifacial modules remains pending. This is particularly true for the rear incident spectrum, which changes depending on the ground type. In this paper, the rear and front long-term spectral impact on bifacial modules is analysed for three locations (Tabernas, Spain; Solar Village, Saudi Arabia; Alta Floresta, Brazil) and four ground types (light soil, white sand, green grass, and concrete slab) at daily, monthly and annual timescales. The SMARTS model is used to generate front and ground-reflected annual spectra. The investigation leads to the definition of a novel metric, called bifacial spectral factor, which quantifies the combined front and rear spectral impact. Results show that the annual bifacial spectral impact differs from the monofacial one due to the influence of the rear spectral irradiance. Green grass is found to have the higher bifacial spectral benefit, leading to yields in between 1.19% and 1.65% higher than in the monofacial case. However, thanks to its high albedo coefficient, white sand is the most convenient ground among the analysed types in terms of bifacial spectral energy gains. The rear spectral factor shows a great range of variation as a function of ground type (between 0.989 and 1.150). However, this is only a non-negiglible second order effect compared to the bifacial spectral factor, which is mainly influenced by the front spectral factor.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 213
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Analysis of spectral effects on the energy yield of different PV (photovoltaic) technologies: The case of four specific sites [J].
Alonso-Abella, M. ;
Chenlo, F. ;
Nofuentes, G. ;
Torres-Ramirez, M. .
ENERGY, 2014, 67 :435-443
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1995, SMARTS, A Simple Model of the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer of Sunshine
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, ASTM G173-03
[4]  
Blakesley J. C., 2020, PROC EUR PHOTOVOLT S, P1292, DOI [10.4229/EUPVSEC20202020-5CO.9.3, DOI 10.4229/EUPVSEC20202020]
[5]  
Bonilla J., 2017, 4 BIFI PV WORKSHOP
[6]   Multi-Variable Bifacial Photovoltaic Module Test Results and Best-Fit Annual Bifacial Energy Yield Model [J].
Castillo-Aguilella, Jose E. ;
Hauser, Paul S. .
IEEE ACCESS, 2016, 4 :498-506
[7]   Improvement and validation of a model for photovoltaic array performance [J].
De Soto, W ;
Klein, SA ;
Beckman, WA .
SOLAR ENERGY, 2006, 80 (01) :78-88
[8]  
Deline C.A., 2019, Bifacial PV system performance: separating fact from fiction
[9]   On the impact of solar spectral irradiance on the yield of different PV technologies [J].
Dirnberger, Daniela ;
Blackburn, Gina ;
Muller, Bjorn ;
Reise, Christian .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2015, 132 :431-442
[10]   Comparative assessment of the spectral impact on the energy yield of high concentrator and conventional photovoltaic technology [J].
Fernandez, Eduardo F. ;
Soria-Moya, Alberto ;
Almonacid, Florencia ;
Aguilera, Jorge .
SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2016, 147 :185-197