A Randomized, Double-Blind Trial to Compare Shock Wave Frequencies of 60 and 120 Shocks per Minute for Upper Ureteral Stones

被引:31
作者
Honey, R. J. D'A. [1 ]
Schuler, T. D. [1 ]
Ghiculete, D. [1 ]
Pace, K. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, St Michaels Hosp, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
关键词
lithotripsy; ureteral calculi; urolithiasis; randomized controlled trial; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; LITHOTRIPSY; SUCCESS; KIDNEY; FRAGMENTATION; ATTENUATION; DISTANCE; CALCULI;
D O I
10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.019
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: Recent evidence demonstrates that decreasing shock wave frequency from the previous standard of 120 to 60 shocks per minute results in improved fragmentation of stones located within the renal collecting system. We report the first randomized trial to our knowledge to examine the effect of a slower shock wave frequency for shock wave lithotripsy on stones located in the proximal ureter. Materials and Methods: A total of 163 patients with a previously untreated radiopaque calculus in the upper ureter measuring at least 5 mm underwent stratified block randomization according to stone size, and shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute. Stone-free status at 3 months was confirmed with noncontrast computerized tomography or a plain abdominal x-ray and ultrasound study. Results: Of the patients 77 were randomized to 60 shocks per minute and 86 were randomized to 120 shocks per minute. The groups were similar in gender, age, body mass index and initial stone area. At 3 months the 60 shocks per minute group had a higher overall stone-free rate (64.9% vs 48.8%, p = 0.039). Significantly fewer shocks were administered to patients treated at 60 shocks per minute (mean 2,680 vs 2,940, p<0.001). However, mean treatment times were longer (44.3 vs 24.5 minutes, p<0.001). Patients treated with 60 shocks per minute required fewer auxiliary procedures (29.9% vs 45.4%) (p = 0.031). Conclusions: Decreasing the rate of shock wave administration from 120 to 60 shocks per minute results in improved stone-free rates. A slower treatment rate of proximal ureteral stones reduces the need for additional shock wave lithotripsy or more invasive treatments to render patients stone-free, without any increase in morbidity, and with an acceptable increase in treatment time.
引用
收藏
页码:1418 / 1423
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Lower pole I: A prospective randomized trial of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrostolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis - Initial results
    Albala, DM
    Assimos, DG
    Clayman, RV
    Denstedt, JD
    Grasso, M
    Gutierrez-Aceves, J
    Kahn, RI
    Leveillee, RJ
    Lingeman, JE
    Macaluso, JN
    Munch, LC
    Nakada, SY
    Newman, RC
    Pearle, MS
    Preminger, GM
    Teichman, J
    Woods, JR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (06) : 2072 - 2080
  • [2] Does a slower treatment rate impact the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for solitary kidney or ureteral stones?
    Chacko, J
    Moore, M
    Sankey, N
    Chandhoke, PS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 175 (04) : 1370 - 1373
  • [3] 1ST CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE WITH EXTRACORPOREALLY INDUCED DESTRUCTION OF KIDNEY-STONES BY SHOCK-WAVES
    CHAUSSY, C
    SCHMIEDT, E
    JOCHAM, D
    BRENDEL, W
    FORSSMANN, B
    WALTHER, V
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1982, 127 (03) : 417 - 420
  • [4] THE INFLUENCE OF FLUID PROPERTIES AND PULSE AMPLITUDE ON BUBBLE DYNAMICS IN THE FIELD OF A SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPTER
    CHOI, MJ
    COLEMAN, AJ
    SAUNDERS, JE
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1993, 38 (11) : 1561 - 1573
  • [5] Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy of 2000 urinary calculi with the Modulith SL-20: Success and failure according to size and location of stones
    Coz, F
    Orvieto, M
    Bustos, M
    Lyng, R
    Stein, C
    Hinrichs, A
    San Francisco, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) : 239 - 246
  • [6] Does rate matter? The results of a randomized controlled trial of 60 versus 120 shocks per minute for shock wave lithotripsy of renal calculi
    Davenport, Kim
    Minervini, Andrea
    Keoghane, Stephen
    Parkin, John
    Keeley, Francis X.
    Timoney, Anthony G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2006, 176 (05) : 2055 - 2058
  • [7] BIOLOGICAL EFFECTS OF SHOCK-WAVES - KIDNEY DAMAGE BY SHOCK-WAVES IN DOGS - DOSE DEPENDENCE
    DELIUS, M
    ENDERS, G
    XUAN, ZR
    LIEBICH, HG
    BRENDEL, W
    [J]. ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1988, 14 (02) : 117 - 122
  • [8] SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY WITH THE DORNIER MFL-5000 LITHOTRIPTOR USING AN EXTERNAL FIXED RATE SIGNAL
    LINGEMAN, JE
    NEWMAN, DM
    SIEGEL, YI
    EICHHORN, T
    PARR, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 154 (03) : 951 - 954
  • [9] Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: A prospective randomized study
    Madbouly, K
    El-Tiraifi, AM
    Seida, M
    El-Faqih, SR
    Atassi, R
    Talic, RF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (01) : 127 - 130
  • [10] Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: A randomized, double-blind trial
    Pace, KT
    Ghiculete, D
    Harju, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02) : 595 - 599