Systematic review with meta-analysis: rifaximin is effective and safe for the treatment of small intestine bacterial overgrowth

被引:179
作者
Gatta, L. [1 ,2 ]
Scarpignato, C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Parma, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Clin Pharmacol & Digest Pathophysiol Unit, Parma, Italy
[2] Versilia Hosp, Gastroenterol & Endoscopy Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Lido Di Camaiore, Italy
关键词
IRRITABLE-BOWEL-SYNDROME; GUT MICROBIOTA; BREATH TEST; ANTIBACTERIAL ACTIVITY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; 5-AMINOSALICYLIC ACID; ANTIBIOTIC-THERAPY; RANDOMIZED-TRIALS; CROHNS-DISEASE; DIETARY FIBER;
D O I
10.1111/apt.13928
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is a heterogeneous syndrome, characterised by an increased number and/or abnormal type of bacteria in the small bowel. Over the past decades, rifaximin has gained popularity for this indication despite its use is not evidence based. Aim To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarise evidence about the efficacy and safety of rifaximin to eradicate SIBO in adult patients. Methods MEDLINE, EMBASE, CCRCT, Scopus and Web of Science were searched from inception to March 16, 2015 for RCTs and observational studies. Furthermore, abstract books of major European, American and Asian gastroenterological meetings were also examined. Results Thirty-two studies involving 1331 patients were included. The overall eradication rate according to intention-to-treat analysis was 70.8% (95% CI: 61.4-78.2; I-2 = 89.4%) and to per protocol analysis 72.9% (95% CI: 65.5-79.8; I-2 = 87.5%). Meta-regression identified three covariates (drug dose, study design and co-therapy) independently associated with an increased eradication rate. The overall rate of adverse events was 4.6% (95% CI: 2.3-7.5; I-2 = 63.6%). In the subset of studies (n= 10) allowing the analysis, improvement or resolution of symptoms in patients with eradicated SIBO was found to be 67.7% (95% CI: 44.7-86.9; I-2 = 91.3%). Conclusions Rifaximin treatment seems to be effective and safe for the treatment of SIBO. However, the quality of the available studies is generally poor. Well-designed RCTs are needed to substantiate these findings and to establish the optimal regimen.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 616
页数:13
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Abu-Shanab Ahmed, 2009, Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, V3, P77, DOI 10.1586/17474124.3.1.77
[2]   Rifaximin: A novel nonabsorbed rifamycin for gastrointestinal disorders [J].
Adachi, JA ;
DuPont, HL .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2006, 42 (04) :541-547
[3]   Mesalazine (5-aminosalicylic acid) alters faecal bacterial profiles, but not mucosal proteolytic activity in diarrhoea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome [J].
Andrews, C. N. ;
Griffiths, T. A. ;
Kaufman, J. ;
Vergnolle, N. ;
Surette, M. G. ;
Rioux, K. P. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2011, 34 (03) :374-383
[4]   Related actions of probiotics and antibiotics on gut microbiota and weight modification [J].
Angelakis, Emmanoui ;
Merhej, Vicky ;
Raoult, Didier .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2013, 13 (10) :889-899
[5]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[6]  
[Anonymous], GASTROENTEROLOGY S2
[7]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[8]  
[Anonymous], HEPATOGASTROENTEROLO
[9]  
[Anonymous], GUT
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Clinical trials: a practical approach