The Impact of Procedural Fairness and Extent of a Tax Loss or Gain on the Acceptance of Tax Authority Decisions and the Intention to Appeal Against Them

被引:4
作者
Niesiobedzka, Malgorzata [1 ]
Kolodziej, Sabina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bialystok, Fac Pedag & Psychol, Bialystok, Poland
[2] Kozminski Univ, Ctr Econ Psychol & Decis Sci, Jagiellonska 59, PL-03301 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
procedural fairness; prospect theory; tax; PROSPECT-THEORY; SOCIAL NORMS; JUSTICE; MODEL; TRUST; VOICE; ANTECEDENTS; ATTITUDES; DEPENDS; MORALE;
D O I
10.1037/law0000187
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
This article presents three studies focusing on the impact of procedural fairness resulting from a tax official's behavior on acceptance of tax authority decisions and intention to appeal in the context of gain and loss frames. The studies were conducted using 588 participants recruited from an online panel (computer-assisted Web interview). In all studies, we introduced a procedural fairness factor. Study 1 manipulated tax frame (gain vs. loss); Study 2, three different extents of loss (small, moderate, and large); and Study 3, three different extents of gain (small, moderate, and large). The results of all three studies demonstrated the significant role of procedural tax fairness. Moreover, Study 1 showed a significant impact of tax frame and Study 2 revealed a significant role of the extent of a tax loss. Study 3, however, found no impact of the extent of a gain on decision acceptance and intention to appeal. Participants accepted all gains and were not willing to appeal against a favorable decision.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 56
页数:11
相关论文
共 73 条
[11]  
Braithwaite V., 2003, Taxing Democracy Tax Avoidance and Tax Evasion, P93
[12]   High procedural fairness heightens the effect of outcome favorability on self-evaluations: An attributional analysis [J].
Brockner, J ;
Heuer, L ;
Magner, N ;
Folger, R ;
Umphress, E ;
van den Bos, K ;
Vermunt, R ;
Magner, M ;
Siegel, P .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2003, 91 (01) :51-68
[13]   Three cheers - psychological, theoretical, empirical - for loss aversion [J].
Camerer, C .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2005, 42 (02) :129-133
[14]  
Camerer C.F., 1998, 1037 CALTECH
[15]   Tax compliance depends on voice of taxpayers [J].
Casal, Sandro ;
Kogler, Christoph ;
Mittone, Luigi ;
Kirchler, Erich .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2016, 56 :141-150
[16]  
Centre for Public Opinion Research, 2018, USITC PUBL, V35
[17]   TAXPAYER ATTITUDES TOWARD TAX AUDIT RISK [J].
CHANG, OH ;
NICHOLS, DR ;
SCHULTZ, JJ .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1987, 8 (03) :299-309
[18]  
Cohen R.L., 1986, JUSTICE SOCIAL RELAT, P65, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4684-5059-0_4
[19]  
Cox D., 1988, ANAL VOLUNTARY UNPUB
[20]   A closer look at the relation between tax complexity and tax equity perceptions [J].
Cuccia, AD ;
Carnes, GA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 22 (02) :113-140