Numerical simulation of enhancement in CO2 sequestration with various water production schemes under multiple well scenarios

被引:15
作者
Chen, Li [1 ]
Liu, Danqing [2 ]
Agarwal, Ramesh [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, 1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
[2] China Univ Geosci, State Key Lab Biogeol & Environm Geol, Wuhan 430074, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
CO2 enhanced brine production; Reservoir pressure; CO2 storage capacity; Multiple well scenarios; STORAGE; RECOVERY; INJECTION; CAPACITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.237
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To determine the best CO2 injection and brine production strategy for achieving both the optimal water production and the optimal CO2 storage capacity while maintaining operational safety in CO2 enhanced brine production, three injection scenarios based on the typical geological parameters of the Junggar Basin in China are compared. They are the sole CO2 injection, sole water production and combined CO2 enhanced water recovery, and for the combined CO2 enhanced water recovery scenario, both the co-production of brine and pre-production of brine are considered. It is found that compared to the pre-production of brine, the combination of pre- and co-production of brine can be more effective in controlling the pressure perturbation and in increasing the CO2 storage capacity. However the volume of co-produced brine plays a smaller role in the pressure build-up. The influence of number of pumping wells is also analyzed. Although increasing the number of wells can enhance the CO2 storage, the economic analysis reveals that the revenue in water production and CO2 storage cannot compensate the expensive investment required in well drilling. The injection strategy is essential to the efficiency of CO2 enhanced water recovery; this paper compares the strategies for pre-production and co-production of brine on CO2 enhanced shale gas recovery. The conclusions given in this paper can serve as a reference for the design engineers interested in CO2 storage with co-production of brine. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 20
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Ampomah W., 2016, ENERGY FUELS, V30
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2012, CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion
  • [3] CO2 storage capacity estimation:: Methodology and gaps
    Bachu, Stefan
    Bonijoly, Didier
    Bradshaw, John
    Burruss, Robert
    Holloway, Sam
    Christensen, Niels Peter
    Mathiassen, Odd Magne
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2007, 1 (04) : 430 - 443
  • [4] Simultaneous CO2 injection and water production to optimise aquifer storage capacity
    Bergmo, Per Eirik S.
    Grimstad, Alv-Arne
    Lindeberg, Erik
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2011, 5 (03) : 555 - 564
  • [5] Basin-scale hydrogeologic impacts of CO2 storage: Capacity and regulatory implications
    Birkholzer, Jens T.
    Zhou, Quanlin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (06) : 745 - 756
  • [6] CBM and CO2-ECBM related sorption processes in coal: A review
    Busch, Andreas
    Gensterblum, Yves
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COAL GEOLOGY, 2011, 87 (02) : 49 - 71
  • [7] Buscheck T. A., 2015, LLNLTR675402
  • [8] Combining Brine Extraction, Desalination, and Residual-Brine Reinjection with CO2 Storage in Saline Formations: Implications for Pressure Management, Capacity, and Risk Mitigation
    Buscheck, Thomas A.
    Sun, Yunwei
    Hao, Yue
    Wolery, Thomas J.
    Bourcier, William
    Tompson, Andrew F. B.
    Jones, Edwin D.
    Friedmann, S. Julio
    Aines, Roger D.
    [J]. 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 : 4283 - 4290
  • [9] Dahaghi A. K., 2013, NUMERICAL SIMULATION
  • [10] CO2 Accounting and Risk Analysis for CO2 Sequestration at Enhanced Oil Recovery Sites
    Dai, Zhenxue
    Viswanathan, Hari
    Middleton, Richard
    Pan, Feng
    Ampomah, William
    Yang, Changbing
    Jia, Wei
    Xiao, Ting
    Lee, Si-Yong
    McPherson, Brian
    Balch, Robert
    Grigg, Reid
    White, Mark
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 50 (14) : 7546 - 7554