Mechanism design for set cover games with selfish element agents

被引:9
作者
Li, Xiang-Yang [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Zheng [3 ]
Wang, WeiZhao [3 ]
Chu, Xiaowen [4 ]
Tang, Shaojie [1 ]
Xu, Ping [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT, Dept Comp Sci, Chicago, IL 60616 USA
[2] Hangzhou Dianzi Univ, Inst Comp Applicat Technol, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[3] Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA
[4] Hong Kong Baptist Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划);
关键词
Set cover; Mechanism design; Strategyproof; REVELATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.tcs.2009.09.024
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this article, we study the set cover games when the elements are selfish agents, each of which has a privately known valuation of receiving the service from the sets, i.e., being covered by some set. Each set is assumed to have a fixed cost. We develop several approximately efficient strategyproof mechanisms that decide, after soliciting the declared bids by all elements, which elements will be covered, which sets will provide the coverage to these selected elements, and how much each element will be charged. For single-cover set cover games, we present a mechanism that is at least 1/d(max)-efficient, i.e., the total valuation of all selected elements is at least 1/d(max) fraction of the total valuation produced any mechanism. Here, d(max) is the maximum size of the sets. For multi-cover set cover games, we present a budget-balanced strategyproof mechanism that is 1/d(max)H(dmax)-efficient under reasonable assumptions. Here, H-n is the harmonic function. For the set cover games when both sets and elements are selfish agents, we show that a cross-monotonic payment-sharing scheme does not necessarily induce a strategyproof mechanism. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:174 / 187
页数:14
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   The price of stability for network design with fair cost allocation [J].
Anshelevich, E ;
Dasgupta, A ;
Kleinberg, J ;
Tardos, É ;
Wexler, T ;
Roughgarden, T .
45TH ANNUAL IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, :295-304
[2]   Approximation and collusion in multicast cost sharing [J].
Archer, A ;
Feigenbaum, J ;
Krishnamurthy, A ;
Sami, R ;
Shenker, S .
GAMES AND ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR, 2004, 47 (01) :36-71
[3]  
Archer A, 2003, SIAM PROC S, P205
[4]  
Chvatal V., 1979, Mathematics of Operations Research, V4, P233, DOI 10.1287/moor.4.3.233
[5]  
Clarke E. H., 1971, Pub- lic choice, P17, DOI DOI 10.1007/BF01726210
[6]  
DEVANUR NR, 2003, P 4 ACM C EL COMM EC, P108
[7]   Hardness results for multicast cost sharing [J].
Feigenbaum, J ;
Krishnamurthy, A ;
Sami, R ;
Shenker, S .
THEORETICAL COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2003, 304 (1-3) :215-236
[8]   CHARACTERIZATION OF SATISFACTORY MECHANISMS FOR REVELATION OF PREFERENCES FOR PUBLIC-GOODS [J].
GREEN, J ;
LAFFONT, JJ .
ECONOMETRICA, 1977, 45 (02) :427-438
[9]   INCENTIVES IN TEAMS [J].
GROVES, T .
ECONOMETRICA, 1973, 41 (04) :617-631
[10]  
Immorlica N, 2005, PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTEENTH ANNUAL ACM-SIAM SYMPOSIUM ON DISCRETE ALGORITHMS, P602