Bridge-Building for Social Transformation in Sport for Development and Peace

被引:25
作者
Svensson, Per G. [1 ]
Loat, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Kinesiol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[2] Comic Relief, London, England
关键词
innovation; interorganizational networks; interorganizational relationships; social change; CROSS-SECTOR PARTNERSHIPS; FOR-DEVELOPMENT; ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY; YOUNG-PEOPLE; NETWORKS; LESSONS; COLLABORATION; CHALLENGES; INNOVATION; DISCOURSE;
D O I
10.1123/jsm.2018-0258
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The need for new and evidence-based solutions for mobilizing stakeholders and resources in sport for development and peace (SDP) is increasingly emphasized in a number of recent policy documents including the Kazan Action Plan and a set of publications by the Commonwealth Secretariat. This paper provides a response to these calls for the development of mechanisms and toolkits to support multistakeholder collaboration. We draw on our combined experiences in SDP research, practice, and funding to identify how multistakeholder initiatives in SDP can be better leveraged. Specifically, we discuss how Brown's (2015) five elements of bridge-building for social transformation, namely, compelling and locally relevant goals; cross-boundary leadership systems; generative theories of change; systems enabling and protecting innovation; and investment in institutionalizing change, apply in the SDP domain. The practical framework we have outlined provides a common ground and starting point to build upon for generating improved synergies among a multitude of stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:426 / 439
页数:14
相关论文
共 110 条
[1]   Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers [J].
Agranoff, Robert .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2006, 66 :56-65
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2016, International Journal of Sport Management and Marketing
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Stanford Social Innovation Review
[4]   Adam Smith's Contribution to Business Ethics, Then and Now [J].
Gonin, Michael .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2015, 129 (01) :221-236
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Kazan Action Plan
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT J SPORT MANAGEME
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2006, OPEN INNOVATION RES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2009, STANFORD SOCIAL INNO
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INT J SPORT MANAGEME
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Social innovation, DOI DOI 10.1057/9780230367098_6