Sensitivity of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies in unselected pregnancies

被引:0
作者
Zhang, WH
Levi, S
Alexander, S
Viart, P
Grandjean, H
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Ecole Sante Publ, Dept Polit & Syst Sante, Unite Sante Reprod & Epidemiol Perinatale, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Clin Cardiol Pediat & Congenitale, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop La Grave, INSERM, U558, Toulouse, France
来源
REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2002年 / 50卷 / 06期
关键词
ultrasound; screening; prenatal diagnosis; congenital heart defect; bias;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the influence of heart defect frequency and severity on screening sensitivity of the entire spectrum of congenital anomalies (CA) and on detection rate of congenital heart defect (CHD) when performing routine ultrasound screening in unselected pregnant women. Study design: Secondary analysis was performed on data from Eurofetus, a large international collaborative study of ultrasound screening for CA in unselected populations. The present study addressed the relations (i) between the frequency of CHD in the screened population and the global sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting CA; (ii) between frequency of ventricular septum defect (VSD) and detection rate of CA and CHD; and (iii) between seriousness of CHD and CHD sensitivity. Results: A negative correlation (p<0.001) between CHD frequency and CA sensitivity was observed in this study. Likewise, a negative correlation was also found between frequency of VSD and sensitivity for CA or CHD detection (p<0.001). In addition, a positive significant relationship (p<0.001) was observed between sensitivity and severity of CHD. Conclusion: A low CHD frequency introduces bias in CA and CHD sensitivity evaluation. Incomplete assessment of fetal and neonatal malformations brings on systematic error, leading to the pre-eminence of severe defects in the studied population sample and artificially improving sensitivity figures. On the other hand, from a clinician's viewpoint, the higher sensitivity for severe defect is welcomed, since their detection is most crucial for appropriate management.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 580
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparison of first and second trimester ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies in the southeast region of Sweden
    Hildebrand, Eric
    Selbing, Anders
    Blomberg, Marie
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (11) : 1412 - 1419
  • [32] Physician Barriers and Facilitators for Screening for Congenital Heart Disease With Routine Obstetric Ultrasound A National United States Survey
    Pinto, Nelangi M.
    Henry, Kevin A.
    Grobman, William A.
    Ness, Amen
    Miller, Stephen
    Ellestad, Sarah
    Gotteiner, Nina
    Tacy, Theresa
    Wei, Guo
    Minich, L. LuAnn
    Kinney, Anita Y.
    JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2020, 39 (06) : 1143 - 1153
  • [33] Screening for congenital heart defects by transabdominal ultrasound - role of early gestational screening and importance of operator training
    Sarkola, Taisto
    Ojala, Tiina H.
    Ulander, Veli-Matti
    Jaeggi, Edgar
    Pitkanen, Olli M.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2015, 94 (03) : 231 - 235
  • [34] The potential diagnostic yield of whole exome sequencing in pregnancies complicated by fetal ultrasound anomalies
    Diderich, Karin E. M.
    Romijn, Kathleen
    Joosten, Marieke
    Govaerts, Lutgarde C. P.
    Polak, Marike
    Bruggenwirth, Hennie T.
    Wilke, Martina
    van Slegtenhorst, Marjon A.
    van Bever, Yolande
    Brooks, Alice S.
    Mancini, Grazia M. S.
    van de Laar, Ingrid M. B. H.
    Kromosoeto, Joan N. R.
    Knapen, Maarten F. C. M.
    Go, Attie T. J., I
    Van Opstal, Diane
    Hoefsloot, Lies H.
    Galjaard, Robert-Jan H.
    Srebniak, Malgorzata, I
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2021, 100 (06) : 1106 - 1115
  • [35] Ultrasound screening for renal and urinary tract anomalies in healthy infants
    Tsuchiya, M
    Hayashida, M
    Yanagihara, T
    Yoshida, J
    Takeda, S
    Tatsuma, N
    Tsugu, H
    Hino, Y
    Munakata, E
    Murakami, M
    PEDIATRICS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 45 (05) : 617 - 623
  • [36] Systematic review of first-trimester ultrasound screening for detection of fetal structural anomalies and factors that affect screening performance
    Karim, J. N.
    Roberts, N. W.
    Salomon, L. J.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 50 (04) : 429 - 441
  • [37] Two-dimensional and four-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of non-cardiac fetal congenital anomalies in high risk pregnancies: a comparative study
    Ibrahim, Nada Ayman Soliman
    Elshorbagy, Kholoud Hamdy
    Darweish, Abdelmonem Nooman
    Khadrah, Rania Sobhy Abou
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2023, 54 (01)
  • [38] False positives in the prenatal ultrasound screening of fetal structural anomalies
    Martinez-Zamora, M. Angels
    Borrell, Antoni
    Borobio, Virginia
    Gonce, Anna
    Perez, Marimer
    Botet, Francesc
    Nadal, Alfons
    Albert, Asteria
    Puerto, Bienvenido
    Fortuny, Albert
    PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2007, 27 (01) : 18 - 22
  • [39] Associated nonurinary congenital anomalies among infants with congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT)
    Stoll, Claude
    Dott, Beatrice
    Alembik, Yves
    Roth, Marie-Paule
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2014, 57 (07) : 322 - 328
  • [40] Ultrasound of Fetal Cardiac Anomalies
    Rajiah, Prabhakar
    Mak, Ceayee
    Dubinksy, Theodore J.
    Dighe, Manjiri
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 197 (04) : W747 - W760