Sensitivity of ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies in unselected pregnancies

被引:0
|
作者
Zhang, WH
Levi, S
Alexander, S
Viart, P
Grandjean, H
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Ecole Sante Publ, Dept Polit & Syst Sante, Unite Sante Reprod & Epidemiol Perinatale, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Free Univ Brussels, Hop Univ Enfants Reine Fabiola, Clin Cardiol Pediat & Congenitale, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
[3] Hop La Grave, INSERM, U558, Toulouse, France
来源
REVUE D EPIDEMIOLOGIE ET DE SANTE PUBLIQUE | 2002年 / 50卷 / 06期
关键词
ultrasound; screening; prenatal diagnosis; congenital heart defect; bias;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objective: To assess the influence of heart defect frequency and severity on screening sensitivity of the entire spectrum of congenital anomalies (CA) and on detection rate of congenital heart defect (CHD) when performing routine ultrasound screening in unselected pregnant women. Study design: Secondary analysis was performed on data from Eurofetus, a large international collaborative study of ultrasound screening for CA in unselected populations. The present study addressed the relations (i) between the frequency of CHD in the screened population and the global sensitivity of ultrasound in detecting CA; (ii) between frequency of ventricular septum defect (VSD) and detection rate of CA and CHD; and (iii) between seriousness of CHD and CHD sensitivity. Results: A negative correlation (p<0.001) between CHD frequency and CA sensitivity was observed in this study. Likewise, a negative correlation was also found between frequency of VSD and sensitivity for CA or CHD detection (p<0.001). In addition, a positive significant relationship (p<0.001) was observed between sensitivity and severity of CHD. Conclusion: A low CHD frequency introduces bias in CA and CHD sensitivity evaluation. Incomplete assessment of fetal and neonatal malformations brings on systematic error, leading to the pre-eminence of severe defects in the studied population sample and artificially improving sensitivity figures. On the other hand, from a clinician's viewpoint, the higher sensitivity for severe defect is welcomed, since their detection is most crucial for appropriate management.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 580
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Screening for Down Syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population
    Rozenberg, P.
    Bussieres, L.
    Chevret, S.
    Bemard, J.-P.
    Malagrida, L.
    Cuckle, H.
    Chabry, C.
    Durand-Zaleski, I.
    Bidat, L.
    Lacroix, I.
    Moulis, M.
    Roger, M.
    Jacquernotic, M. -C.
    Bault, J. -P.
    Boukobza, P.
    Boccaram, P.
    Vialat, F.
    Giudicelli, Y.
    Ville, Y.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2007, 35 (04): : 303 - 311
  • [22] Ultrasound screening for fetal anomalies in Southern Sweden:: a population-based study
    Nikkila, Annamari
    Rydhstroem, Hakan
    Kallen, Bengt
    Jorgensen, Connie
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (06) : 688 - 693
  • [23] ANTENATAL ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSIS OF CONGENITAL ANOMALIES: A CENTRAL INDIAN PERSPECTIVE
    Gurjar, Bhakti
    Kedar, Kshama
    Deshpande, Anagha
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (23): : 1251 - 1254
  • [24] Prevalence of congenital malformations during pregnancy in China: screening by ultrasound examination
    Kong, L. J.
    Fan, L.
    Li, G. H.
    Zhang, W. Y.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 44 (05) : 772 - 776
  • [25] A prospective study of ultrasound screening for molar pregnancies in missed miscarriages
    Johns, J
    Greenwold, N
    Buckley, S
    Jauniaux, E
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 25 (05) : 493 - 497
  • [26] Screening for fetal anomalies by ultrasound at 14 and 21 weeks
    D'Ottavio, G
    Meir, YJ
    Rustico, MA
    Pecile, V
    Fischer-Tamaro, L
    Conoscenti, G
    Natale, R
    Mandruzzato, GP
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 1997, 10 (06) : 375 - 380
  • [27] Screening for Down syndrome using first-trimester combined screening followed by second-trimester ultrasound examination in an unselected population
    Rozenberg, Patrick
    Bussieres, Laurence
    Chevret, Sylvie
    Bernard, Jean Pierre
    Malagrida, Lydia
    Cuckle, Howard
    Chabry, Chantal
    Durand-Zaleski, Isabelle
    Bidat, Laurent
    Lacroix, Isabelle
    Moutis, Max
    Roger, Marc
    Jacquemot, Christine
    Bault, Jean Philippe
    Boukobza, Philippe
    Boccara, Patrick
    Vialard, Francois
    Giudicelli, Yves
    Ville, Yves
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (05) : 1379 - 1387
  • [28] Assessment of ultrasound and Doppler parameters in the third trimester of pregnancy as predictors of adverse perinatal outcome in unselected pregnancies
    Peixoto, Alberto Borges
    Rodrigues da Cunha Caldas, Taciana Mara
    Godoy Silva, Tacito Augusto
    Silva Gomes Caetano, Mario Sergio
    Martins, Wellington P.
    Martins Santana, Eduardo Felix
    Araujo Junior, Edward
    GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA, 2016, 87 (07) : 510 - 515
  • [29] Learning Curve of First-Trimester Detailed Cardiovascular Ultrasound Screening by Moderately Experienced Obstetricians in 3509 Consecutive Unselected Pregnancies with Fetal Follow-Up
    Elekes, Tibor
    Csermely, Gyula
    Kadar, Krisztina
    Molnar, Laszlo
    Keszthelyi, Gabor
    Hozsdora, Andrea
    Vizer, Miklos
    Torok, Marianna
    Merkely, Petra
    Varbiro, Szabolcs
    LIFE-BASEL, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [30] Ultrasonographic Screening of Newborns for Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and the Urinary Tracts
    Tabel, Yilmaz
    Haskologlu, Zeliha Sule
    Karakas, Hakki Muammer
    Yakinci, Cengiz
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2010, 7 (03) : 161 - 167