Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient value as prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmad, Medhat Ibraheem Mohammad [1 ]
Sabr, Mohammad [2 ]
Roshy, Eman [3 ]
机构
[1] Sohag Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sohag, Egypt
[2] Sohag Univ Hosp, Urol Dept, Sohag, Egypt
[3] Sohag Univ Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sohag, Egypt
关键词
SUBTYPE DIFFERENTIATION; WEIGHTED MRI; MASSES; BENIGN; GRADE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-019-0038-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Assurance of prognostic elements is important for the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Our goal was to check the relation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and parameters predicting prognosis of RCC. Fifty pathologically confirmed RCC underwent diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI. ADC values were calculated using b factor (800 s/mm(2)). The correlation between ADC values and tumor size, cystic/necrotic feature, growth pattern, unenhanced T1, histological grade, clinical stage, and distant metastasis were analyzed. Results The optimal ADC threshold for prognosis of RCC appeared to be 1.4 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. There was a significant inverse correlation between ADC values and growth pattern (R = - 0, P = 0.05), unenhanced T1(R = - 0.41, P = 0.01), cystic/necrotic feature (R = - 0.4, P = 0.01), histological grade (R = - 0.37, P = 0.02), clinical stage (r = - 0.4, P = 0.01), and distant metastasis (R = - 0.33, P = 0.04), and significant linear correlation with tumor size (R = 0.39, P < 0.02). Conclusion The performance of ADC value as a newly proposed prognostic parameter follows with the degree of tumor differentiation and that may recognize extremely aggressive RCC. RCC with low ADC values should be inspected extensively for the risk of high pathological grade, high clinical stage, and distant metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Malignant mucosal melanoma treated with carbon ion radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy: Prognostic value of pretreatment apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
    Jingu, Keiichi
    Kishimoto, Riwa
    Mizoe, Jun-Etsu
    Hasegawa, Azusa
    Bessho, Hiroki
    Tsuji, Hiroshi
    Kamada, Tadashi
    Yamada, Shogo
    Tsujii, Hirohiko
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 98 (01) : 68 - 73
  • [42] The Preeminent Value of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Assessing High-Risk Factors and Prognosis for Stage I Endometrial Carcinoma Patients
    Quan, Quan
    Peng, Hui
    Gong, Sainan
    Liu, Jiali
    Lu, Yunfeng
    Chen, Rongsheng
    Mu, Xiaoling
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [43] Thymidine phosphorylase levels as a prognostic factor in renal cell carcinoma
    Wada, S
    Yoshimura, R
    Naganuma, T
    Yoshida, N
    Narita, K
    Ikemoto, S
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 91 (01) : 105 - 108
  • [44] Comparison of Utility of Histogram Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and R2*for Differentiation of Low-Grade From High-Grade Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Zhang, Yu-Dong
    Wu, Chen-Jiang
    Wang, Qing
    Zhang, Jing
    Wang, Xiao-Ning
    Liu, Xi-Sheng
    Shi, Hai-Bin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 205 (02) : W193 - W201
  • [45] Correlation analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient value and P53 and Ki-67 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
    Wang, Yating
    Bai, Genji
    Zhang, Xi
    Shan, Wenli
    Xu, Lihua
    Chen, Wei
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2020, 68 : 183 - 189
  • [46] The value of apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in the differential diagnosis of vertebral bone marrow lesions
    Taskin, Gulten
    Incesu, Lutfi
    Aslan, Kerim
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 43 (03) : 379 - 387
  • [47] Apparent diffusion coefficient value as a biomarker reflecting morphological and biological features of prostate cancer
    Bae, Hyeyeol
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Matsuoka, Yoh
    Nakajima, Hiroshi
    Ito, Eisaku
    Tanaka, Hiroshi
    Oya, Miyako
    Nakayama, Takayuki
    Takeshita, Hideki
    Kijima, Toshiki
    Ishioka, Junichiro
    Numao, Noboru
    Koga, Fumitaka
    Saito, Kazutaka
    Akashi, Takumi
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2014, 46 (03) : 555 - 561
  • [48] Assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma using apparent diffusion coefficient and diffusion kurtosis indices: preliminary experience in fresh liver explants
    Rosenkrantz, Andrew B.
    Sigmund, Eric E.
    Winnick, Aaron
    Niver, Benjamin E.
    Spieler, Bradley
    Morgan, Glyn R.
    Hajdu, Cristina H.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (10) : 1534 - 1540
  • [49] Evaluation of the normal-to-diseased apparent diffusion coefficient ratio as an indicator of prostate cancer aggressiveness
    Lebovici, Andrei
    Sfrangeu, Silviu A.
    Feier, Diana
    Caraiani, Cosmin
    Lucan, Ciprian
    Suciu, Mihai
    Elec, Florin
    Iacob, Gheorghita
    Buruian, Mircea
    BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2014, 14
  • [50] Risk stratification of ductal carcinoma in situ using whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient
    Kim, Jin You
    Kim, Jin Joo
    Lee, Ji Won
    Lee, Nam Kyung
    Lee, Geewon
    Kang, Taewoo
    Park, Heesung
    Son, Yo Han
    Grimm, Robert
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (02) : 485 - 493