Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient value as prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmad, Medhat Ibraheem Mohammad [1 ]
Sabr, Mohammad [2 ]
Roshy, Eman [3 ]
机构
[1] Sohag Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sohag, Egypt
[2] Sohag Univ Hosp, Urol Dept, Sohag, Egypt
[3] Sohag Univ Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sohag, Egypt
关键词
SUBTYPE DIFFERENTIATION; WEIGHTED MRI; MASSES; BENIGN; GRADE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-019-0038-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Assurance of prognostic elements is important for the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Our goal was to check the relation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and parameters predicting prognosis of RCC. Fifty pathologically confirmed RCC underwent diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI. ADC values were calculated using b factor (800 s/mm(2)). The correlation between ADC values and tumor size, cystic/necrotic feature, growth pattern, unenhanced T1, histological grade, clinical stage, and distant metastasis were analyzed. Results The optimal ADC threshold for prognosis of RCC appeared to be 1.4 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. There was a significant inverse correlation between ADC values and growth pattern (R = - 0, P = 0.05), unenhanced T1(R = - 0.41, P = 0.01), cystic/necrotic feature (R = - 0.4, P = 0.01), histological grade (R = - 0.37, P = 0.02), clinical stage (r = - 0.4, P = 0.01), and distant metastasis (R = - 0.33, P = 0.04), and significant linear correlation with tumor size (R = 0.39, P < 0.02). Conclusion The performance of ADC value as a newly proposed prognostic parameter follows with the degree of tumor differentiation and that may recognize extremely aggressive RCC. RCC with low ADC values should be inspected extensively for the risk of high pathological grade, high clinical stage, and distant metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prognostic Significance of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients treated with Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy
    Lo, Cheng-Hsiang
    Huang, Wen-Yen
    Hsiang, Chih-Weim
    Lee, Meei-Shyuan
    Lin, Chun-Shu
    Yang, Jen-Fu
    Hsu, Hsian-He
    Chang, Wei-Chou
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [32] Application of different methods used to measure the apparent diffusion coefficient of renal cell carcinoma on the same lesion and its correlation with ISUP nuclear grading
    Kilicarslan, Gulhan
    Eroglu, Yesim
    Kilicarslan, Ahmet
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 47 (07) : 2442 - 2452
  • [33] Histogram Analysis of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient at 3.0T: Correlation With Prognostic Factors and Subtypes of Invasive Ductal Carcinoma
    Kim, Eun Jeong
    Kim, Sung Hun
    Park, Ga Eun
    Kang, Bong Joo
    Song, Byung Joo
    Kim, Yun Ju
    Lee, Dongeon
    Ahn, Hyunsoo
    Kim, Inah
    Son, Yo Han
    Grimm, Robert
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (06) : 1666 - 1678
  • [34] Assessment of aggressiveness of rectal cancer using 3-T MRI: correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient as a potential imaging biomarker and histologic prognostic factors
    Akashi, Michiaki
    Nakahusa, Yuji
    Yakabe, Tomomi
    Egashira, Yoshiyuki
    Koga, Yasuo
    Sumi, Kenji
    Noshiro, Hirokazu
    Irie, Hiroyuki
    Tokunaga, Osamu
    Miyazaki, Kohji
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2014, 55 (05) : 524 - 531
  • [35] In vivo assessment of optimal b-value range for perfusion-insensitive apparent diffusion coefficient imaging
    Freiman, Moti
    Voss, Stephan D.
    Mulkern, Robert V.
    Perez-Rossello, Jeannette M.
    Callahan, Michael J.
    Warfield, Simon K.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (08) : 4832 - 4839
  • [36] Additional Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging to Evaluate Prognostic Factors of Breast Cancer: Correlation with the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient
    Park, Eun Kyung
    Cho, Kyu Ran
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    Woo, Ok Hee
    Cho, Sung Bum
    Bae, Jeoung Won
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (01)
  • [37] The value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating type II from type I endometrial carcinoma
    Chen, Jingya
    Fan, Weimin
    Gu, Hailei
    Wang, Yaohui
    Liu, Yuting
    Chen, Xiao
    Ren, Shuai
    Wang, Zhongqiu
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2021, 62 (07) : 959 - 965
  • [38] Apparent diffusion coefficient values are superior to transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy for the assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness
    Li, Chunmei
    Chen, Min
    Wang, Jianye
    Wang, Xuan
    Zhang, Wei
    Zhang, Chen
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2017, 58 (02) : 232 - 239
  • [39] Glioblastoma treated with postoperative radio-chemotherapy: Prognostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient at MR imaging
    Yamasaki, Fumiyuki
    Sugiyama, Kazuhiko
    Ohtaki, Megu
    Takeshima, Yukio
    Abe, Nobukazu
    Akiyama, Yuji
    Takaba, Junko
    Amatya, Vishwa Jeet
    Saito, Taiichi
    Kajiwara, Yoshinori
    Hanaya, Ryosuke
    Kurisu, Kaoru
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 73 (03) : 532 - 537
  • [40] Diffusion-weighted imaging in breast cancer: relationship between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness
    Costantini, M.
    Belli, P.
    Rinaldi, P.
    Bufi, E.
    Giardina, G.
    Franceschini, G.
    Petrone, G.
    Bonomo, L.
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2010, 65 (12) : 1005 - 1012