Assessment of apparent diffusion coefficient value as prognostic factor for renal cell carcinoma aggressiveness

被引:0
|
作者
Ahmad, Medhat Ibraheem Mohammad [1 ]
Sabr, Mohammad [2 ]
Roshy, Eman [3 ]
机构
[1] Sohag Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sohag, Egypt
[2] Sohag Univ Hosp, Urol Dept, Sohag, Egypt
[3] Sohag Univ Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth & Community Med, Sohag, Egypt
关键词
SUBTYPE DIFFERENTIATION; WEIGHTED MRI; MASSES; BENIGN; GRADE;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-019-0038-3
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Assurance of prognostic elements is important for the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Our goal was to check the relation between apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and parameters predicting prognosis of RCC. Fifty pathologically confirmed RCC underwent diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI. ADC values were calculated using b factor (800 s/mm(2)). The correlation between ADC values and tumor size, cystic/necrotic feature, growth pattern, unenhanced T1, histological grade, clinical stage, and distant metastasis were analyzed. Results The optimal ADC threshold for prognosis of RCC appeared to be 1.4 x 10(-3) mm(2)/s. There was a significant inverse correlation between ADC values and growth pattern (R = - 0, P = 0.05), unenhanced T1(R = - 0.41, P = 0.01), cystic/necrotic feature (R = - 0.4, P = 0.01), histological grade (R = - 0.37, P = 0.02), clinical stage (r = - 0.4, P = 0.01), and distant metastasis (R = - 0.33, P = 0.04), and significant linear correlation with tumor size (R = 0.39, P < 0.02). Conclusion The performance of ADC value as a newly proposed prognostic parameter follows with the degree of tumor differentiation and that may recognize extremely aggressive RCC. RCC with low ADC values should be inspected extensively for the risk of high pathological grade, high clinical stage, and distant metastasis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient for the accurate assessment and differentiation of intracranial meningiomas
    Bano, Shazia
    Waraich, Mustansar Mahmood
    Khan, Muhammad Afzal
    Buzdar, Saeed Ahmad
    Manzur, Shahid
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA OPEN, 2013, 2 (07):
  • [22] Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer: Correlation of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient With Histologic Grade After Radical Prostatectomy
    Verma, Sadhna
    Rajesh, Arumugam
    Morales, Humberto
    Lemen, Lisa
    Bills, Gordon
    Delworth, Mark
    Gaitonde, Krish
    Ying, Jun
    Samartunga, Ranasinghe
    Lamba, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2011, 196 (02) : 374 - 381
  • [23] Differentiation of solid and friable tumour thrombus in patients with renal cell carcinoma: The role of MRI apparent diffusion coefficient
    Kowal, Pawel
    Ratajczyk, Krzysztof
    Bursiewicz, Wiktor
    Trzciniecki, Maciej
    Marek-Bukowiec, Karolina
    Rogala, Joanna
    Kowalskyi, Vasyl
    Dragasek, Jozef
    Botikova, Andrea
    Kruzliak, Peter
    Mytsyk, Yulian
    ADVANCES IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 69 (02): : 434 - 442
  • [24] Utility of Pretreatment Mean Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histograms in Prediction of Outcome to Chemoradiation in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Srinivasan, Ashok
    Chenevert, Thomas L.
    Dwamena, Ben A.
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Watcharotone, Kuanwong
    Myles, James D.
    Mukherji, Suresh K.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2012, 36 (01) : 131 - 137
  • [25] The Relationship between Breast Cancer Subtypes, Prognostic Factors, and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Histogram Analysis
    Aktas, Elif
    Seber, Tugba Uylar
    Seber, Turgut
    Burcek, Nihan Vasfiye
    Akay, Ebru
    Arslan, Alaettin
    Eren, Saliha Karagoz
    Ozhan, Nail
    Bilgin, Ezel Yaltirik
    Savran, Burcu
    Akdur, Pinar
    CURRENT MEDICAL IMAGING, 2024, 20
  • [26] Can Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Related Apparent Diffusion Coefficient be a Prognostic Value in Women With Breast Cancer?
    Rabasco, Paola
    Caivano, Rocchina
    Simeon, Vittorio
    Dinardo, Giuseppina
    Lotumolo, Antonella
    Gioioso, Matilde
    Villonio, Antonio
    Iannelli, Giancarlo
    D'Antuono, Felice
    Zandolino, Alexis
    Macarini, Luca
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    Cammarota, Aldo
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 2017, 35 (02) : 92 - 99
  • [27] Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Value of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Correlation with the Histologic Differentiation and the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor
    Heo, Suk Hee
    Jeong, Yong Yeon
    Shin, Sang Soo
    Kim, Jin Woong
    Lim, Hyo Soon
    Lee, Jae Hyuk
    Koh, Yang Seok
    Cho, Chol Kyoon
    Kang, Heoung Keun
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 11 (03) : 295 - 303
  • [28] Textural Differences in Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Between Low- and High-Stage Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Kierans, Andrea S.
    Rusinek, Henry
    Lee, Andrew
    Shaikh, Mohammed B.
    Triolo, Michael
    Huang, William C.
    Chandarana, Hersh
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2014, 203 (06) : W637 - W644
  • [29] Diagnostic performance of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient value in differentiating the invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ
    Zhao, Suhong
    Shao, Guangrui
    Chen, Peipei
    Li, Liang
    Yang, Yuhai
    Zhao, Xianhua
    Guo, Weihua
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 15 (04) : 871 - 875
  • [30] Diagnostic value of texture analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps for differentiating fat-poor angiomyolipoma from non-clear-cell renal cell carcinoma
    Arita, Yuki
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Kwee, Thomas C.
    Akita, Hirotaka
    Okuda, Shigeo
    Iwaita, Yuki
    Mukai, Kiyoko
    Matsumoto, Shunya
    Ueda, Ryo
    Ishii, Ryota
    Mizuno, Ryuichi
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Oya, Mototsugu
    Jinzaki, Masahiro
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 143